All Forum Comments
Comment by Daniel Bridge posted on how much better would a 50mm prime really be? at 12/11/2007 - 13:37
I've just read that wikipedia entry
I need to lie down for a while!
Why on Earth would you do a thing like that?
Dan
Comment by Daniel Bridge posted on Apex shutter speed? at 13/11/2007 - 14:27
Comment by Daniel Bridge posted on Apex shutter speed? at 10/11/2007 - 12:41
Backup body for wildlife, so agreed - me neither; I'll keep looking. Thanks
Dan
Comment by Daniel Bridge posted on What's the difference between the MZ5 and MZ5N? at 10/11/2007 - 11:47
Well, I suppose it depends on how you use your camera, but for me the Depth of Field Preview is a big 'it'! Wouldn't buy a camera without it.
Why is it so useful?
I mean, I know what it does, and why, but I've always found that if I'm stopping down enough to get much DOF, the viewfinder is so dark that it's hard to tell what's sharp. It's obvious that it's sharper, but how on earth do you see whether it's sharp enough?
If you're stopping the lens down past f/11 or so, you've got to let your eye adjust, so keep it closed down for a couple of seconds.
However, I mainly use it for checking DoF when using a lens fairly wide, especially with a londer lens when shooting wildlife, just to make sure I'm getting sufficient DoF without making the background too defined. ALso good for macro stuff, to which I'm partial.
I suppose now we can just check the screen on DSLRs it's not so important, but I still find it good to check before a shot, certainly if I'm shooting birds that are moving about and the background's constantly changing.
Force of habit from my film days I suppose.
Dan
Comment by Daniel Bridge posted on What's the difference between the MZ5 and MZ5N? at 10/11/2007 - 11:38
And that's it?
Dan
Comment by Daniel Bridge posted on What's the difference between the MZ5 and MZ5N? at 10/11/2007 - 09:47
My experience is that most modern lenses have some degree of wobble and looseness in their design. Even the 16-45 isn't completely solid and tight. Set the 16-45 to 16mm and you can move the barrel around a little bit.
Dan
Comment by Daniel Bridge posted on Tamron 18-250mm Di II Pentax Mount. at 14/11/2007 - 23:37
Haven't had a chance to look at the pics I took on screen yet. Noticed a fair degree of barrel distortion at 18mm, and vignetting at f/3.5-5.6 at the wide end too, but you'll tend to get this with any consumer zoom.
As a general use, walkabout lens, I reckon it's probably fantastic.
Have fun when it arrives, and obviously show us some results.
Dan
Comment by Daniel Bridge posted on Tamron 18-250mm Di II Pentax Mount. at 10/11/2007 - 09:45
Focusing is critical, especially when used fairly wide, and being such a heavy lens, you need a very sturdy tripod (or a large bean bag) to ensure a crisp image. I haven't used it much on my K10D, but the good shots from my *istD are very nice and sharp. Not the sharpest lens I have, but still pretty damn good.
Dan
Comment by Daniel Bridge posted on New Toy, I'm in love! at 10/11/2007 - 10:01
Works okay with my 1.7x AF convertor too, makes a nice 500mm f/4.8, but quality's certainly better without it.
Have fun!
Dan
Comment by Daniel Bridge posted on New Toy, I'm in love! at 09/11/2007 - 23:14


Dan