Daniel Bridge

Joined: 21st March 2006

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

Daniel Bridge
...and of course if the South and London User Group (SLUG) ever met up again, you'd be more than welcome to try out any lens I have.

Dan

Comment by Daniel Bridge posted on how much better would a 50mm prime really be? at 12/11/2007 - 13:37

Daniel Bridge
Quote:
I've just read that wikipedia entry

I need to lie down for a while!
You read it?

Why on Earth would you do a thing like that?

Dan

Comment by Daniel Bridge posted on Apex shutter speed? at 13/11/2007 - 14:27

Daniel Bridge
Google "exif apex", you should get some including http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/APEX_system

Dan

Comment by Daniel Bridge posted on Apex shutter speed? at 10/11/2007 - 12:41

Daniel Bridge
Quote:
Backup body for wildlife, so agreed - me neither; I'll keep looking. Thanks
You've got a PM.

Dan

Comment by Daniel Bridge posted on What's the difference between the MZ5 and MZ5N? at 10/11/2007 - 11:47

Daniel Bridge
Quote:
Daniel Bridge wrote:
Well, I suppose it depends on how you use your camera, but for me the Depth of Field Preview is a big 'it'! Wouldn't buy a camera without it.
Ooh I've always wanted to meet someone that actually uses this!!

Why is it so useful?

I mean, I know what it does, and why, but I've always found that if I'm stopping down enough to get much DOF, the viewfinder is so dark that it's hard to tell what's sharp. It's obvious that it's sharper, but how on earth do you see whether it's sharp enough?
Well, first off, I use a rubber eyecup, which I find really helps increase contrast and apparent brightness in the viewfinder, so this helps once the lens is stopped down.

If you're stopping the lens down past f/11 or so, you've got to let your eye adjust, so keep it closed down for a couple of seconds.

However, I mainly use it for checking DoF when using a lens fairly wide, especially with a londer lens when shooting wildlife, just to make sure I'm getting sufficient DoF without making the background too defined. ALso good for macro stuff, to which I'm partial.

I suppose now we can just check the screen on DSLRs it's not so important, but I still find it good to check before a shot, certainly if I'm shooting birds that are moving about and the background's constantly changing.

Force of habit from my film days I suppose.

Dan

Comment by Daniel Bridge posted on What's the difference between the MZ5 and MZ5N? at 10/11/2007 - 11:38

Daniel Bridge
Quote:
And that's it?
Well, I suppose it depends on how you use your camera, but for me the Depth of Field Preview is a big 'it'! Wouldn't buy a camera without it.

Dan

Comment by Daniel Bridge posted on What's the difference between the MZ5 and MZ5N? at 10/11/2007 - 09:47

Daniel Bridge
Quote:
My experience is that most modern lenses have some degree of wobble and looseness in their design. Even the 16-45 isn't completely solid and tight. Set the 16-45 to 16mm and you can move the barrel around a little bit.
Exactly why I thought it worth mentioning. For a consumer lens the Tamron is very solid indeed. I have the 16-45 and am well aware it wobbles.

Dan

Comment by Daniel Bridge posted on Tamron 18-250mm Di II Pentax Mount. at 14/11/2007 - 23:37

Daniel Bridge
I tried one out yesterday and it seemed fine - certainly no complaints over build quality, nice and solid and no wobble even at the longest setting.

Haven't had a chance to look at the pics I took on screen yet. Noticed a fair degree of barrel distortion at 18mm, and vignetting at f/3.5-5.6 at the wide end too, but you'll tend to get this with any consumer zoom.

As a general use, walkabout lens, I reckon it's probably fantastic.

Have fun when it arrives, and obviously show us some results.

Dan

Comment by Daniel Bridge posted on Tamron 18-250mm Di II Pentax Mount. at 10/11/2007 - 09:45

Daniel Bridge
After I'd seen your post last night, I had a look through some of the shots I've taken with it, and was reminded just how good a lens it is, as long as it's used carefully!

Focusing is critical, especially when used fairly wide, and being such a heavy lens, you need a very sturdy tripod (or a large bean bag) to ensure a crisp image. I haven't used it much on my K10D, but the good shots from my *istD are very nice and sharp. Not the sharpest lens I have, but still pretty damn good.

Dan

Comment by Daniel Bridge posted on New Toy, I'm in love! at 10/11/2007 - 10:01

Daniel Bridge
I've got one of those too - nice when I can be bothered to lug it about. I tend to use it mostly either in the garden, or when I know I'm going somewhere specifically to use it, it's not something I carry about on the off-chance.

Works okay with my 1.7x AF convertor too, makes a nice 500mm f/4.8, but quality's certainly better without it.

Have fun!

Dan

Comment by Daniel Bridge posted on New Toy, I'm in love! at 09/11/2007 - 23:14

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo