All Forum Comments
Comment by Dangermouse posted on auction lens at 02/02/2011 - 15:15
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Pentax AF201SA - ever officially sold in UK? at 02/02/2011 - 14:36
AFAIK all genuine Pentax flashguns are safe on digital, at least those in the AF series such as the AF160 and later. Those with TTL will not work in that mode, but any Auto modes will work perfectly as they use the flash's own light sensor to decide how much light is needed. You just set the shutter speed, ISO and aperture in M mode to what the flash expects (flash set to A) and shoot, the flash will handle the rest. This goes for the AF160 and AF200S.
Weirdly if you go back a generation before the TTL units you come to the Program flashes - these will work perfectly on your DSLR, if you set both units to P and change the ISO the aperture will be changed to suit the flash's expectations.
Some TTL models are still useful to you such as the AF200T, AF280T and AF400T. These all have assorted manual and auto modes, in fact when using the auto modes they behave like a Program flash. Just don't switch them to TTL as it won't work.
I have tested the following models on my K-m:
AF160
AF200S
AF200SA
AF200T
AF240Z
AF280T
All worked, none blew it up. They even illuminate the "flash ready" icon in the viewfinder, just as on my ME Super!
Of these models I would say to keep an eye out for the AF240Z (Program/Auto/Manual modes, has a tilt head with built-in telephoto adapter), AF200T (fixed head but incredibly flexible with two auto modes and variable power in manual) and AF280T (pan/tilt head, two auto, three manual modes).
My other advice would be to avoid anything with "SA" on the end - these are usually program-only and while they will work very well you'll be stuck in point and shoot mode. Same goes for some of the later TTL models. If you're not sure then try searching for a manual for the flash you're considering - you can download these free from a few places and you should be able to figure out what the flash can do.
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Backward compatible ? at 02/02/2011 - 14:32
I do tend to wince at their more expensive offerings. Generally they appear to be aimed at magpies judging by the ghastly fake silver bits!
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Bargain Basement Lenses at 01/02/2011 - 21:15
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Long Pentax Lenses at 01/02/2011 - 20:19
Managed to avoid all of them AFAIK, although I think one made its escape between the front and rear wheels as I hit the brakes to avoid squashing it.
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Another pointless thread at 01/02/2011 - 19:30
It still works now, and has only a dent in the baseplate to show for its brief Superman impression.
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Parcelforce - employing shot-putters to deliver!!?? at 01/02/2011 - 19:28
I would like something like an 80-200mm f2.8 but that's more a lack of funds than a lack of available lenses!
Comment by Dangermouse posted on My word..Canon owners want into the Pentax system.... at 01/02/2011 - 18:32
If you look at historic models Pentax generally only had two or three different bodies available at any one time. The original K series numbered three, then the ME and MX, then ME Super and MV/MV1/MG, and so on. In all of these cases there was a premium model and a budget one, although I'm not quite sure how that fits with the KM/KX/K2 where the KX has some features that the supposedly top of the range K2 lacks!
Comment by Dangermouse posted on kx and k7 both officially discontinued? at 01/02/2011 - 14:18
Comment by Dangermouse posted on always read the small print at 01/02/2011 - 12:32


You could probably sell them on for much more than you paid, but my advice would be to have a play and keep what you find you like. I'd probably sell the ME Supers and the non-Pentax gear but keep the rest.