All Forum Comments
Comment by ChrisA posted on Officially K-3? at 11/10/2013 - 16:06
I do agree with you Chris which is why I also use Nikon. I should have said "those who don't want a different brand" should not be disappointed.
That's precisely why I'll be so disappointed if, after nearly 7 years since buying my first dSLR, they still can't deliver the one thing I want most of all.
Anyway, no point worrying now until it comes out and the reviewers do their thing. It'll be very good, I have no doubt. But whether it's good enough in the way I want, only time will tell.
Comment by ChrisA posted on Officially K-3? at 11/10/2013 - 14:23
I guess a few folks will be bitterly disappointed if the AF turns out to be no improvement. But on the whole its looking a fantastic camera release. Well done Ricoh.
I don't care about more pixels, less AA, video, electronic levels (fixed or otherwise), 8.6 fps, five BEELION metering points, FLU or any of that stuff.
Quicker, more accurate AF, with tracking, is the one thing I've been waiting a long time for. If they still haven't provided it, I don't think I have the patience to await yet another generation.
Comment by ChrisA posted on Officially K-3? at 11/10/2013 - 13:42
Yes I read that too Chris, reading between the lines and falling through them methinks
Comment by ChrisA posted on Officially K-3? at 11/10/2013 - 13:08
DPreview have a preview of the K3 and they love it. There only critism was despite all the extra AF points, the AF barely performed any better than the K5 II.
I've read their 'first impressions' review and the only thing I can see that comes close to this is at the end, where they say
"Camera performance is generally very snappy, though we were hoping that the new AF system would be faster."
Comment by ChrisA posted on Officially K-3? at 11/10/2013 - 13:02
Even if we knew that next generation SDM lens would be required, it would be great to get a message out there if the potential to be close or match competitors AF speeds now existed
I'm definitely one of the ones that need convincing - it's the only reason I haven't pre-ordered at SRS already
Comment by ChrisA posted on When can we expect a detailed review of the K3? at 10/10/2013 - 13:04
The only caveat I would like to put in is that every man-made item has a margin of error, and if that error is plus or minus 1 degree then no amount of adjusting and replacing will change that. It's a guide.
a) The alleged precision is 0.5 degree. On the LCD it's 0.5 degrees per bar; in the VF it's 1 degree per bar. The error on mine is about 1.5 degrees which with a clear horizon, is very obvious indeed.
b) The auto-horizon correction feature is tied to the electronic level - if one's out, so is the other. Pentax must have invested considerable resources in building, and supposedly testing, the link between the electronic level readout and moving the sensor to achieve the automatic horizon control. It would be a cracking feature if it was reliable (I'd just leave it on most of the time to save a bit of faffing in post) - IMO it's a case of spoiling the ship for a ha'porth of tar.
c) Mobile phones have had the calibration option built in for ages.
As I say, to each his own priorities and workarounds. I just hope Pentax read the myriad complaints on the US forum at the time, and sorted it for the K-3. Apols for going off topic.
Comment by ChrisA posted on What will the new Pentax really offer us? at 10/10/2013 - 12:55
I gave up using it. But what it needs is a calibration menu item - put it on a known horizontal surface, hit "calibrate", and it re-zeros it.
Put it on a known horizontal surface,look at what the level indicates, then if you want to use it tilt camera until the level is at that previously indicated value?
I'll note just two:
- I've paid money, why should I have to compensate for a failing that isn't mine?
- Customers who are content to work around issues, rather than complain vociferously about them, lull manufacturers into thinking that it's not important to sort them out.
If they implement a feature, it should work.
Comment by ChrisA posted on What will the new Pentax really offer us? at 10/10/2013 - 10:16
How odd, Chris. I was considering starting a thread celebrating the electronic level feature which seems to me to save hundreds (thousands?) of pixels as I no longer have to straighten horizons and crop when photographing sea-scapes or buildings. I find it one of the camera's most endearing additions and miss it when using my K10. Perhaps yours needs calibrating.
In my case the first K-5 I had went back because of it (and one or two other minor problems), and when I collected the replacement, I tried three in the shop straight out of the boxes until I found one that was properly level when the camera was level. Then I tested it again when I got it home, and it was still ok, and then again a few days later and it wasn't.
It's easy enough to check, even if the surface you put it on isn't level. Just measure the lean, then turn it round thru 180 degrees, and obviously it should indicate the same amount of lean in the other direction.
I gave up using it. But what it needs is a calibration menu item - put it on a known horizontal surface, hit "calibrate", and it re-zeros it.
Comment by ChrisA posted on What will the new Pentax really offer us? at 09/10/2013 - 18:01
And as Chris A says, maybe they just ran out of room?
If it's as rubbish in the K-3 as it is in the K-5, you all better duck, since my toys will be emerging from my pram at warp factor 8.
How's the level in the K5-II by the way?
Comment by ChrisA posted on What will the new Pentax really offer us? at 09/10/2013 - 17:44


Yes I read that too Chris, reading between the lines and falling through them methinks
Daniel