All Forum Comments
noidea wrote:
I actually have the camera and the manual! I just can't figure it out!
You are probably the first user on this forum that has the K-R so no one might be able to help you.I actually have the camera and the manual! I just can't figure it out!
Comment by Anvh posted on Adjusting iso with K-r at 20/10/2010 - 17:50
MattMatic wrote:
The K20D, and K10D could be programmed to map the ISO onto a wheel (either front or back)
Press and holding the OK button and scrolling the front wheel is also a way to change ISO with these cameras.The K20D, and K10D could be programmed to map the ISO onto a wheel (either front or back)
Maybe it also works with the K-r?
Comment by Anvh posted on Adjusting iso with K-r at 20/10/2010 - 17:48
Field test with the 645D link
Never thought i would hear anyone say Pentax SDM and very focusing in one sentence
Wow... look at 5:30, the camera gets really wet there.
Never thought i would hear anyone say Pentax SDM and very focusing in one sentence
Wow... look at 5:30, the camera gets really wet there.
Comment by Anvh posted on A 645D review from a hands on shoot at 20/10/2010 - 16:40
Something else though but informative.
An interview with Ned Bunnel at PHOTOKINA 2010 link
In the end they also talk a bit about the economy.
An interview with Ned Bunnel at PHOTOKINA 2010 link
In the end they also talk a bit about the economy.
Comment by Anvh posted on Pentax Aim To Quadruple Sales at 20/10/2010 - 16:31
The club is still there (I think) but they are closing/changing a service of the club.
Comment by Anvh posted on Last magazine at 20/10/2010 - 16:10
Thank you John.
I agree it's quite a lot of calculation but at least it insures that you've a suitable lens with you if you've one off course.
Beyond that for SLR there is no real need for the FOV, the viewfinder give you the information you need to see if the subjects fits in the frame or not
johnriley wrote:
If I don't own a suitable lens, then calculating what I might have needed won't help.
Indeed but the problem was when you want to travel light and only want to take one or two lenses with you.If I don't own a suitable lens, then calculating what I might have needed won't help.
I agree it's quite a lot of calculation but at least it insures that you've a suitable lens with you if you've one off course.
Beyond that for SLR there is no real need for the FOV, the viewfinder give you the information you need to see if the subjects fits in the frame or not
Comment by Anvh posted on Is there a cheap way to go wider than 18mm? at 20/10/2010 - 15:01
Hey beer
http://theoatmeal.com/comics/beer
Funny how this thread comes always down to that
How many of you have cenoscillicaphobia?
http://theoatmeal.com/comics/beer
Funny how this thread comes always down to that
How many of you have cenoscillicaphobia?
Comment by Anvh posted on Another pointless thread at 20/10/2010 - 12:34
I agree that 21 will be a more general focal length that would be more usefull for more situations.
If you really liked your Tamron 24 from the old days then the DA 15mm would be (roughly) the equivalent for that.
You can also bite the bullet and get the nice limited lens case which fit several limited lenses and fill that one.
http://nedbunnell.blogspot.com/2009/02/da-limited-lens-case.html
If you really liked your Tamron 24 from the old days then the DA 15mm would be (roughly) the equivalent for that.
You can also bite the bullet and get the nice limited lens case which fit several limited lenses and fill that one.
http://nedbunnell.blogspot.com/2009/02/da-limited-lens-case.html
Comment by Anvh posted on Do I need Priming? at 20/10/2010 - 12:03
The 243 is a car window head so it won't fit on the monopod i believe.link