aliengrove

Joined: 3rd January 2010

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

aliengrove
Thanks very much for that, I've just been looking at the plugin. I'll give it a try. It looks like it could be be useful for what I'm trying to do, which is basically to get the detail of IR and the colour of a normal shot in the same image. I've had some success with blending images using CMYK, but can't get the colours quite right.

Comment by aliengrove posted on Converting sRGB toYCbCr at 17/06/2013 - 00:40

aliengrove
MattMatic wrote:
Just processing the JPG images you've put up it looks like the Red and Blue channels are swapped
(Used a Channel Mixer in PS)

You haven't said what the original image actually was - DNG, PEF, JPG.

I'm not even 100% sure which camera you have! Though looking at your gallery it looks like a K5II.

I've seen the purple straggly line and seriously bad colour appear in Picasa when it wasn't up to date - and its RAW conversion was off. I had this issue with Picasa and the K5IIs until Google got its act (nearly) together!

More info would be good

Matt
I just ran both images through an action I use for infrared, which swaps the red and blue channels, and they came out looking completely normal, so the red and blue channels are definitely swapped in both of these files. It looks more like a software problem than a sensor problem.

Comment Image



Comment Image

Comment by aliengrove posted on Any ideas??? at 17/06/2013 - 00:09

aliengrove
I've had a look at Imagemagick but it looks pretty complicated. Basically i want to be able to convert an sRGB file from my K5 to YcbCr, and then replace the luminance channel with the one from an infrared file. I also want to try replacing the luminance channel in a 665nm image with one from an 830nm image.
Gimp can edit YCbCr images, but I can't find any conversion tool available to convert the images in Gimp.

Comment by aliengrove posted on Converting sRGB toYCbCr at 16/06/2013 - 23:48

aliengrove
I don't suppose we have a member here fluent in Linux, who can tell me a simple way to do this conversion, preferably with some sort of Photoshop (or more likely Gimp) action, and then to be able to convert the image back to sRGB after editing? I understand some Linux but not enough to do this. Any advice much appreciated.

Comment by aliengrove posted on Converting sRGB toYCbCr at 16/06/2013 - 23:22

aliengrove
I find carrying a few spare batteries far more convenient than turning what is a great reasonably sized camera into a heavy, bulky monster. I shoot a lot in portrait, and personally don't find any problem with the controls rotating the camera. I've even been tempted to switch completely to mirrorless cameras; my IR converted Nex has the same sensor as my K5, and is half the size and less than half the weight. I do like the size and weight of the K5, though, but would not want it any bigger. I'm hoping Pentax is going to come out with a full-frame camera with the size and ergonomics of the K5. If it comes out looking and feeling like one of those bulky FF Canikons with a grip welded to it, I won't be buying one.

Comment by aliengrove posted on K5IIs, how good then? at 15/06/2013 - 21:53

aliengrove
JAK wrote:
McGregNi wrote:
I hope we see a break in the trend towards ever reducing body sizes - I'd love to have a camera alone that matched the dimensions of my K7 including its battery grip, with all the features of the battery grip (controls and extra power) incorporated within the body. As the grip is permanently on the body, both for handheld and tripod shooting, this would be ideal for me.
Ooo no, the K-5 is just about right, but I wouldn't complain if it was smaller still.

John K
I agree, if the next Pentax is the same size as a K5 with grip, I doubt very much I would buy one. Personally I don't get the whole thing with grips; I just don't see the point of making a camera bigger than it needs to be to work..

Comment by aliengrove posted on K5IIs, how good then? at 15/06/2013 - 21:13

aliengrove
DrOrloff wrote:
The Q7 (why not Q5?) does look interesting.
Because when everyone has bought a Q7 they will come out with the Q5 which will probabbly be the same quantum leap as the K7 to K5 was....

Comment by aliengrove posted on Pentax Q7 at 14/06/2013 - 20:02

aliengrove
Some really cool shots there

Comment by aliengrove posted on Perfectly Timed Photos at 14/06/2013 - 19:45

aliengrove
if they follow the naming of the K series cameras, a Q5 should be out next year....

Comment by aliengrove posted on Three new cameras to play with at 13/06/2013 - 11:02

aliengrove
My 4 quid Zenit E takes Pentax lenses.....though it came with a Helios 55mm.


I think I'm going to sell it on ebay with a Lomo tag on it for for 150 quid....unless of course anyone here wants to make me an offer....

Comment by aliengrove posted on Lomography......Oh Dear at 10/06/2013 - 18:42

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo