Possible K-5 Specs !!

K10D
Posted 13/09/2010 - 05:02 Link
Mike-P wrote:
K10D wrote:


Camera less but lens buoyant?

Regards
Gary, do you not think you may be hitting those tins of Fosters a bit hard
Never seen it for sale here Mike.

I think they should ban Margaret River wines though as they are disgracefully nice.

Regards
Too far from a shore.
flossie
Posted 13/09/2010 - 09:25 Link
Ooh err, is that the sound of a leaky NDA?

German webshop

Comment Image


New kit lens - 18-135WR - hmmm...
Still shooting in the dark (literally and metaphorically)...
Mike-P
Posted 13/09/2010 - 12:55 Link
flossie wrote:


New kit lens - 18-135WR - hmmm...
Has been said for a while now that this may be coming.
Good move on Pentax's part methinks, I will buy one if it performs well.
dougf8
Posted 13/09/2010 - 12:58 Link
mmmmmmm 18-135mm I'll have two please.

Pray its in the 16-45mm performance bracket.
Or as good as the 18-55mm WR kit and I'll be happy.
Lurking is shirking.!
Edited by dougf8: 13/09/2010 - 12:59
Mike-P
Posted 13/09/2010 - 13:05 Link
It adds approx £350 to the price over body only so going on Pentax's pricing if you want a retail version it should cost about £500.
dougf8
Posted 13/09/2010 - 13:12 Link
Gwyn wrote:
Ah well. I guess we just have to wait and see.
Maybe these rumours are more what people hope it is than what it in reality is.
It is still top of my shopping list until I hear the real specs which might make me think otherwise.

I can't see where they would put a double card slot in a K-7 sized camera anyway.
I would like double slots as I would expect them to allow you to have a fast card in one and to copy contents to a slow card in the other. Archiving on the trot pretty handy for extended trips. A few cheap slow cards as well as a fast card.
Lurking is shirking.!
Smeggypants
Posted 13/09/2010 - 14:59 Link
dougf8 wrote:
mmmmmmm 18-135mm I'll have two please.
Comment Image
[i]Bodies: 1x K-5IIs, 2x K-5, Sony TX-5, Nokia 808
Lenses: Pentax DA 10-17mm ED(IF) Fish Eye, Pentax DA 14mm f/2.8, Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8, Pentax-A 28mm f/2.8, Sigma 30mm F1.4 EX DC, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.2, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-FA 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.7, Pentax DA* 50-135mm f/2.8, Sigma 135-400mm APO DG, and more ..
Flash: AF-540FGZ, Vivitar 283
Don
Posted 13/09/2010 - 15:05 Link
Mike-P wrote:
flossie wrote:


New kit lens - 18-135WR - hmmm...
Has been said for a while now that this may be coming.
Good move on Pentax's part methinks, I will buy one if it performs well.
now there is a useful range for a walk about lens and general Wedding shooting....
Fired many shots. Didn't kill anything.
dougf8
Posted 13/09/2010 - 15:22 Link
Smeggypants wrote:
dougf8 wrote:
mmmmmmm 18-135mm I'll have two please.
Comment Image
Bespoke for Marty Feldman ?
Lurking is shirking.!
Gwyn
Posted 13/09/2010 - 16:13 Link
dougf8 wrote:

Bespoke for Marty Feldman ?
Off Topic.

A great loss to comedy. Was it the cartoonist, the lobster or the fags coffee and eggs which killed him? we shall never know. The eyes were due to Graves disease.

Back on topic, sounds a promising walkabout lens. Might even be tempted by it, even though I have the 17-70 and 50-135. Damn and I thought my LBA was cured
Smeggypants
Posted 13/09/2010 - 20:01 Link
Gwyn wrote:
dougf8 wrote:

Bespoke for Marty Feldman ?
Off Topic.

A great loss to comedy. Was it the cartoonist, the lobster or the fags coffee and eggs which killed him? we shall never know. The eyes were due to Graves disease.

Back on topic, sounds a promising walkabout lens. Might even be tempted by it, even though I have the 17-70 and 50-135. Damn and I thought my LBA was cured
I have a Sigma 17-70, which now I've calibrated the AF on the body, is pretty darn good and a 50-135.

An 18-135 sounds tempting but my next wad will probably go on the K-5
[i]Bodies: 1x K-5IIs, 2x K-5, Sony TX-5, Nokia 808
Lenses: Pentax DA 10-17mm ED(IF) Fish Eye, Pentax DA 14mm f/2.8, Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8, Pentax-A 28mm f/2.8, Sigma 30mm F1.4 EX DC, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.2, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-FA 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.7, Pentax DA* 50-135mm f/2.8, Sigma 135-400mm APO DG, and more ..
Flash: AF-540FGZ, Vivitar 283
Gwyn
Posted 13/09/2010 - 22:02 Link
Smeggypants wrote:


I have a Sigma 17-70, which now I've calibrated the AF on the body, is pretty darn good and a 50-135.

An 18-135 sounds tempting but my next wad will probably go on the K-5
Mine too, but I may get the kit if there is really is an 18-135WR option, instead of just the body.
flossie
Posted 13/09/2010 - 22:11 Link
well if there is the usual kit/retail price difference, you can always buy the whole kit then flog the lens off at cost-difference if you don't like it, and everyone is happy...

edit: having said that, no doubt the retailers will be one step ahead of you and will be selling lots of body-only K5's that came from broken kits, like they did with the Kx....
Still shooting in the dark (literally and metaphorically)...
Edited by flossie: 13/09/2010 - 22:13
MrCynical
Posted 13/09/2010 - 22:24 Link
An 18-135 would, assuming that it is decent optically, be a very useful lens indeed - especially WR. Where does it leave the 17-70 though? Even though a new kit lens wouldn't be as sharp as it, I'd personally take range and WR.
Unlocker
Posted 13/09/2010 - 23:33 Link
Hmmm...

Comment Image

Add Comment

To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo