lens question
- Topic Locked - You will not be able to post to this topic. thread has strayed off topic
Posted 23/06/2011 - 15:16
Link
Ha ha - PentaxExpert is brill. I've seen his threads before (was it on here or PF ? Can't remember) he's a master WUM.
http://frogfish.smugmug.com/ Pentax. Pentax DA*300/4, Cosina 55/1.2, Lens Baby Composer Pro & Edge 80, AFA x1.7, Metz 50 af1.
Nikon. D800. D600. Sigma 500/4.5, Nikon 300/2.8 VRII, Sigma 120-300/2.8, Zeiss Distagon ZF2 21/2.8, Zeiss Distagon ZF2 35/2.0, Sigma 50/1.4, Nikkor 85/1.8, Nikon TC20EIII, Nikon TC14EII, Kenko x1.4, Sigma 2.0
Nikon. D800. D600. Sigma 500/4.5, Nikon 300/2.8 VRII, Sigma 120-300/2.8, Zeiss Distagon ZF2 21/2.8, Zeiss Distagon ZF2 35/2.0, Sigma 50/1.4, Nikkor 85/1.8, Nikon TC20EIII, Nikon TC14EII, Kenko x1.4, Sigma 2.0
Posted 23/06/2011 - 15:17
Link
I was pointing out that just becase something is labelled PRO it doesn't make it so.
I would also note that just because you can afford an expensive camera and equipment (which I can't either) doesn't make you a Pro or even competant. In my other field of woodcarving there is some very expensive gear, which without the skills to use it just sharp (if you know how to sharpen it) hardware.
I dearly hope that my skills (in both fields) have improved by trying to imitate those who are so obviously better than me and I hope I'm thick skinned enough to be told my work could improve- but please tell me how.
regards
Bernard
I would also note that just because you can afford an expensive camera and equipment (which I can't either) doesn't make you a Pro or even competant. In my other field of woodcarving there is some very expensive gear, which without the skills to use it just sharp (if you know how to sharpen it) hardware.
I dearly hope that my skills (in both fields) have improved by trying to imitate those who are so obviously better than me and I hope I'm thick skinned enough to be told my work could improve- but please tell me how.
regards
Bernard
Posted 23/06/2011 - 15:28
Link
PentaxExpert wrote:
He did also mention that it has plenty of chromatic abhoration. What does this mean.
I think he means its got plenty of funky green and purple colour fringing built in!He did also mention that it has plenty of chromatic abhoration. What does this mean.
John
John K
Posted 23/06/2011 - 15:52
Link
A while back there was a series on BBC4 where three photographers were given wildly different cameras (usually a digital medium format, a top-of-range compact and a mobile phone) and given a project. All the photos were shown at the end of the programme and the mobile phone guy turned in far better photos than I could take with my DSLR.
OK - this may tell you that I'm a rubbish photographer (but improving ) but it also shows that someone with a good eye can still take really good images even with a pre-smartphone mobile camera.
OK - this may tell you that I'm a rubbish photographer (but improving ) but it also shows that someone with a good eye can still take really good images even with a pre-smartphone mobile camera.
Posted 23/06/2011 - 17:36
Link
SkyRyder
have you seen the piccies put up by PentaxExpert ?
Take a look at them . They are worth seeing .
I'm weeping lots of crocodile tears - My lenses won't take this Pro 58mm lens that's so highly praised by PentaxExpert's friend in that well known purveyor of camera gear
have you seen the piccies put up by PentaxExpert ?
Take a look at them . They are worth seeing .
I'm weeping lots of crocodile tears - My lenses won't take this Pro 58mm lens that's so highly praised by PentaxExpert's friend in that well known purveyor of camera gear
let the education continue
proud owner of a couple of cameras and a few bits and bobs
proud owner of a couple of cameras and a few bits and bobs
Posted 23/06/2011 - 19:23
Link
Yes Skyrider actually my pictures are worth seeing. I think they are. In fact I think they are 'ahead of the game' in that those who can not see beyond the end of their DA star whatever lense can not appreciate that art expression and creativitry can take on different forms not always technically perfect.
PPG
It's not about what kit I've got, its about having the knowledge to use it to maximum potential.
It's not about what kit I've got, its about having the knowledge to use it to maximum potential.
Posted 23/06/2011 - 19:28
Link
Posted 23/06/2011 - 20:00
Link
I think its obvious that PantexExport is way ahead of us all here, following the links to his images clearly shows he has knowledge far beyond my understanding of photography (far beyond anyones I think)
So heres a challenge for him, please give me some honest criticism on this arty farty shot I took of a lady who was completely naked apart from her shoes:
[IMG]http://i80.photobucket.com/albums/j168/impotentspider/010.jpg[/IMG]
So heres a challenge for him, please give me some honest criticism on this arty farty shot I took of a lady who was completely naked apart from her shoes:
[IMG]http://i80.photobucket.com/albums/j168/impotentspider/010.jpg[/IMG]
Posted 23/06/2011 - 20:06
Link
How do we know that isn't your foot with a borrowed shoe and trouser leg rolled up just out of the way?
Now that would be avant garde
Bernard
Now that would be avant garde
Bernard
Posted 23/06/2011 - 20:10
Link
PentaxExpert wrote:
fat spider, was she really naked, please tell me straight because it affects how I think about the shot
Oh yes she was completely naked.fat spider, was she really naked, please tell me straight because it affects how I think about the shot
Frogherder wrote:
How do we know that isn't your foot with a borrowed shoe and trouser leg rolled up just out of the way?
Now that would be avant garde
Bernard
Those who know me well will vouch for the fact that my high heels are size 12, those in the image are clearly size 6
How do we know that isn't your foot with a borrowed shoe and trouser leg rolled up just out of the way?
Now that would be avant garde
Bernard


355 posts
17 years
too close to SRS Watford.......
Buy two now before the price goes up. If you put the second one over your viewfinder facing the wrong way round you won't see any of the chromatic aberrations.If you keep it the same way round you'll get twice as much for hardly any more money- which is brilliant!!
One day I hope to own Nikon stuff so I won't even have to be there to take an award winning photo.
Me super, MX, LX, K5,DA 18-55WR, DA 17-70, DA 55-300, DA40 Ltd, FA50 1.4, Samsung D-Xenon 12-24,Samsung 100mm macro M50 1.7(x3), M28 3.5, M35 2.8, M100macro f4, M135 3.5(+others)