PLUS

womble

Joined: 11th September 2008

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

womble
I can see them in Flickr easily enough. Stunning photos, very nice indeed. K.

Comment by womble posted on Poppy Head at 14/07/2010 - 23:44

womble
Looks like the right type of animal! Thanks Tim. The light balance does need sorting out. The rocks to the left are very bright and the critter was in the shade. It was a quickly grabbed shot so I was quite pleased with it.

K.

Comment by womble posted on As seen in the Rocky Mountains at 14/07/2010 - 23:36

womble
Comment Image


If anyone knows what sort of rodent this is, please let me know!

K.

Comment by womble posted on As seen in the Rocky Mountains at 14/07/2010 - 23:11

womble
pink wrote:
In fact the people I’ve shown the image to have asked "did you take this image or download it from the internet?" I don’t no whether to feel insulted or delighted?
Overtly offended and covertly pleased. It is a photo with many possibilities and variations, many of which would be great. Personally, I would be tempted to tone down the saturation of the blue which makes it a little too surreal for my taste. All in all, rather nice, however. Well done.

K.

Comment by womble posted on advice on crop St Michaels mount at the time of opening this thread there is only one image at 14/07/2010 - 21:52

womble
I took a number of minor variations on the image below and cannot make up my mind which one I prefer. I think I prefer number 1, but perhaps number 3... Or do you prefer some other crop? Or should I bin them?! All taken with my Jupiter-9 85mm.

1.
Comment Image


2.
Comment Image


3. (with bug)
Comment Image


4. (without bug)
Comment Image


I used to be indecisive but now I am not sure...

K.

Comment by womble posted on Advice on my oats (four images) at 14/07/2010 - 21:39

womble
Well done Mike, always nice to see one's work in print.

A little tip for anyone who cares... when scanning thin paper (like newspaper) put some black card/paper behind the page you are scanning. That way, the text on the other side of the page doesn't show through. Works when photocopying and making copy photos too.

Best wishes, Kris.

Comment by womble posted on Spitfire Flypast (3 pics) at 14/07/2010 - 20:59

womble
I'm not even getting wee blue squares...

Comment by womble posted on Poppy Head at 14/07/2010 - 20:51

womble
I clicked, I viewed, I liked...

Personally, I think numbers 3, 5 and 17 are the strongest.

Best wishes, Kris

Comment by womble posted on Llanberis Slate Museum at 14/07/2010 - 20:46

womble
Four more from my recent US visit. All with the K20D.

1. Tamron 70-300mm.
Comment Image


2. Tamron 70-300mm
Comment Image


3. SMC Pentax-M 100mm f/2.8
Comment Image


4. SMC Pentax-DA* 50-135mm
Comment Image


Best wishes, Kris.

Comment by womble posted on Some more from the US (four images) at 14/07/2010 - 00:34

womble
FYI. If you do go down the photoshop route, the best way (IMHO) to convert is using a BW adjustment layer avilable in CS3 onwards. Lightroom also uses a similar system (although not presented as a layer).

I like Matt's idea of shooting in jpeg+RAW simply because "seeing" in BW is something that comes with experience and being able to preview your image that way would be a good learning tool. Did I understand beakynet correctly that the K-7 allows you to digitally add filters too, e.g., a high contrast red filter or a YG filter? That would also be awesome for learning how these filters impact on a monochrome image.

As much as I love using film, for teaching/learning digital is so much more effective.

Best wishes, Kris.

Comment by womble posted on Mono at 13/07/2010 - 10:39

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo