All Forum Comments
Comment by womble posted on Advertising at 10/12/2010 - 13:34
K.
Comment by womble posted on tower or laptop? at 10/12/2010 - 12:26
Comment by womble posted on Anyone use an A or FA 24mm/28mm with digital? at 10/12/2010 - 12:21
One question in my mind, however, is what film? Happy snaps junk 200 ASA colour print film, or Ilford Delta 100? Developed how? Printed how? Scanned how? Kodak Ektar 100, the new colour print film, is rumoured to have been developed with scanning in mind, for example. I also find it fascinating that one can buy software to mimic film images. Clearly there is something about film images that many enjoy.
I shoot some film because I enjoy it. Nothing more, nothing less. I don't care if it is better or worse than digital. Why do I use my Lubitel 2 instead of my Yashica Mat 124 G? Because it is basic and fiddly and fun and I have no idea what the results might be like. Why do I use a Pentax ES? Because it is a beautiful solid piece of machinery. Why am I eyeing up a FED-4? Because I'll never be able to afford a real Leica and I am curious what using a range-finder is like. The fact that I have sold my K10D and kept all my film cameras is that I have never developed the affection for the black blob that I have for my LX.
If your aim in life is to produce high quality images for photo competitions then the easiest route to technical quality is to shoot digital and Thoramay has probably made the right decision to not use her Z1. In my case, photography is fun and part of that fun is learning how to use old equipment. When photographing finds from my excavations I use my digital SLR and AF macro lens. When taking macro pictures for fun I may well use my M 100 with extension tubes or my LX with the magnifying viewfinder. I got my maths teacher to show me how to work a slide rule even though I had a calculator. Why? Because I wanted to know! One day I'll have my own darkroom. Why? Because I will enjoy it and it doesn't involve my laptop. Until, of course, I scan the prints to post on Flickr...!
We are all in this game for different reasons, some as a career, some as a way of relaxing and some for their egos. The choice of kit should be dictated by one's aims. I just hope enough of us find film fun to keep it going for a good few years yet.
K.
Comment by womble posted on negatives to computer at 10/12/2010 - 07:56
K.
Comment by womble posted on In praise of the humble MV1 at 09/12/2010 - 22:20
You set out with all good intention to use your 35mm equipment and find it is not so simple.
I have been told at the Club last night that the cd system from the likes of Boots will not give results sufficient to take up to A4 for comp work.
Getting a reasonable scanner is simply not cost effective. My slide scanner is out on loan. Perhaps it was not such a good idea.. but I don't like the idea of just leaving the Z1 to languish in a drawer.
regards Thoramay.
K.
Comment by womble posted on negatives to computer at 09/12/2010 - 14:26
K.
Comment by womble posted on negatives to computer at 09/12/2010 - 11:22
I wouldn't mind one of the motor KX bodies with winder and the bulk film back, although all of those parts seem ludicrously rare. I narrowly missed one of the motor drives a month or two ago which was the only one I can recall having seen.
K.
Comment by womble posted on Money no object at 09/12/2010 - 07:45
Best wishes, Kris.
Comment by womble posted on Money no object at 09/12/2010 - 07:41
BTW, there was almost a disaster when I was taking the photos of the ponies. While I was concentrating on one of the ponies, one of the others tried to eat my LX...
Best wishes, Kris.

Comment by womble posted on Hoar frost at 08/12/2010 - 18:23




I don't see the ads thanks to Ad Blocker Plus, but yes it is Big Brother Google watching you.