wadna

Joined: 19th July 2008

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

wadna
At maximum jpeg quality that's roughly 536 frames taking 5 minutes 35 seconds!

Comment by wadna posted on K-5 Sloooow Lo Speed continuous shooting at 12/07/2012 - 00:25

wadna
johnriley wrote:
Quote:
why the drop mentioned for the LO mode
I'm going to guess that the Lo rate is the fastest possible rate that can be continuous until the card is full.

The fast rate can of course be reduced by using a slower shutter speed. You can't do 7fps with a shutter speed of 1/2 second for example.
I'm sure that's why they chose 1.6fps & it makes for a good advertising point. Whether 1.6fps is useful is another matter. Who needs to fill an 8GB card in one long "burst" & who needs to fill it at 1.6fps?

Comment by wadna posted on K-5 Sloooow Lo Speed continuous shooting at 11/07/2012 - 23:29

wadna
beakynet wrote:
wadna wrote:
Of course this does allow Pentax to boast that on continuous you can keep shooting jpegs until the card fills. Some achievement.

Even the K10D could do that at 3.5FPS!
That's "progress" for you.

Comment by wadna posted on K-5 Sloooow Lo Speed continuous shooting at 11/07/2012 - 13:18

wadna
johnriley wrote:
I suppose what you are asking for is a continuously variable setting? I don't see whay it couldn't be done, but I've never seen it mentioned before so maybe nobody has thought it was needed.
I looked for that John hoping that Pentax had it hidden somewhere in the book, the menu or the drive screen. No such luck.

I think a continuously variable setting is needed.

Comment by wadna posted on K-5 Sloooow Lo Speed continuous shooting at 11/07/2012 - 13:06

wadna
Mike-P wrote:
Yes I agree, 1.6fps is totally ridiculous.

Whoever thought up that idea needs to be shot, 3 or 4 would have been just right.
"needs to be shot." That's a bit harsh!

However the idea that 1.6fps is useful for anything other than advertising is idiotic.

Comment by wadna posted on K-5 Sloooow Lo Speed continuous shooting at 11/07/2012 - 13:04

wadna
Having just bought a K-5 to replace my K-7 I'm loving it ..............except for the abysmally slow Lo Speed continuous shooting which at 1.6fps is too slow for Street Photography. Hi speed at 7fps is great for Sport but for Street it's overkill. 3fps on the K-7 was perfect for Street.

Of course this does allow Pentax to boast that on continuous you can keep shooting jpegs until the card fills. Some achievement.

Anyone else feel as I do? I had hoped that a firmware upgrade would address this but no such luck.

Comment by wadna posted on K-5 Sloooow Lo Speed continuous shooting at 11/07/2012 - 11:46

wadna
Thanks for that Nigel. It, & the links contained, made interesting reading.

Comment by wadna posted on DA 14 f2.8, DA 15 f4 or something else? at 10/07/2012 - 00:20

wadna
Thanks all.

Comment by wadna posted on DA 14 f2.8, DA 15 f4 or something else? at 09/07/2012 - 00:03

wadna
Impressive photos Smeggy.
I was surprised by the relatively shallow DOF in the mosque shot.
Thanks.

Comment by wadna posted on DA 14 f2.8, DA 15 f4 or something else? at 08/07/2012 - 08:49

wadna
Welcome.
Regards,
Ian.

Comment by wadna posted on I´m one more in pentax user at 08/07/2012 - 07:28

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo