wadna

Joined: 19th July 2008

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

wadna
"I was referring to 30 frames being a lot before the buffer fills."

But that wasn't the subject & you didn't explain yourself................. & the comment still seems totally irrelevant. However you're right; 30 frames at 7fps is a lot, perhaps not up to pro camera levels but plenty for most of us.

Regards,
Ian.

Comment by wadna posted on POLL. How useful is the K-5 Low speed continuous 1.6fps at 18/07/2012 - 12:41

wadna
"I've only ever used continuous Hi. Just wish I could get 7 fps (RAW)"

I haven't tried measuring the High speed rate but it's too fast for general shooting (Street etc.). Should be great for sport but I gather you can't achieve that rate. I know it seems awfully fast when I use Hi speed for Street.

Regards,
Ian.

Comment by wadna posted on POLL. How useful is the K-5 Low speed continuous 1.6fps at 18/07/2012 - 12:12

wadna
Mike-P wrote:
wvbarnes wrote:
This is a 7 frames per second up to 30 frames camera. What would we need more for?
Do people actually read these threads before commenting?

We are talking about the K-5 LOW continuous rate being too slow, not the high rate needing to be faster.
"Do people actually read these threads before commenting?"

Apparently not Mike!

Regards,
Ian.

Comment by wadna posted on POLL. How useful is the K-5 Low speed continuous 1.6fps at 18/07/2012 - 11:42

wadna
"This is a 7 frames per second up to 30 frames camera. What would we need more for?"
Who asked for more Bill? The subject is the abysmally slow Low Speed shooting of the K-5 (1.4fps using RAW). My K-7 did 3fps using RAW. That's a much more useful speed.

"35mm size sensor cameras often have high speed compact flash for storage (they need it). This might explain the difference"
Both the K-7 & K-5 have APS-C sensors. The K-5 Low Speed shooting is set to 1.6fps using jpg whereas the K-7 was set to 3fps using jpg.

Regards,
Ian.

Comment by wadna posted on POLL. How useful is the K-5 Low speed continuous 1.6fps at 18/07/2012 - 11:40

wadna
"I've only ever used continuous by mistake when I didn't turn the little switch all the way back"
I think you're confusing continuous shooting with continuous auto focus Bernard.

Regards,
Ian.

Comment by wadna posted on POLL. How useful is the K-5 Low speed continuous 1.6fps at 18/07/2012 - 11:34

wadna
Class 10 SanDisk. My K-7 could do 3fps with no dramas on Low speed & 5fps on High speed - AF permitting. There is little difference between K-7 & K-5 file sizes.

Comment by wadna posted on POLL. How useful is the K-5 Low speed continuous 1.6fps at 18/07/2012 - 11:02

wadna
Class 10 SanDisk. My K-7 could do 3fps with no dramas on Low speed & 5fps on High speed - AF permitting. There is little difference between K-7 & K-5 file sizes.

Comment by wadna posted on K-5 Sloooow Lo Speed continuous shooting at 18/07/2012 - 11:01

wadna
A quick test shooting in RAW reveals my K-5 struggles to reach 1.4fps.

Comment by wadna posted on K-5 Sloooow Lo Speed continuous shooting at 18/07/2012 - 07:23

wadna
A quick test shooting in RAW reveals the K-5 barely manages 1.4fps.

Comment by wadna posted on POLL. How useful is the K-5 Low speed continuous 1.6fps at 18/07/2012 - 07:20

wadna
Considering the price I paid here in Oz a month ago for a new K-5 (A$799 posted) I would be checking the price for it as it's now a discontinued model.

Comment by wadna posted on Need help on choosing a Pentax DSLR at 14/07/2012 - 11:01

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo