Woah! That is quite impressive.

The K10D can still hold its own against new cameras. It lacks live-view but other than that is one brilliant piece of kit. Wouldn't trade mine for anything.

(Except a K-Mount S5 Pro )

I couldn't really say at the moment as things could change very quickly. I'll have to get back to you on this one.

Definitely think the sky adds to the image. It is way too claustrophobic without it.

Did you do on the monorail when in Sidney or just shoot it?

Sidney was very pleasant but busy when I was there.

I had one of them in my garden a few weeks back. I couldn't get a good shot as minimal focus distance on the 18-55 wasn't good enough to get any real detail.

Looks good to me, how much of the frame is that image?

All of a sudden there are several A200F4 lenses going and I can't afford them

Rather crewel really

I do know that the 645 version sells for ~£200second hand.

I'd guess the 135 version would sell for less.

So nobody knows how much... All I've seen is the M version for £50 and I know the A version is a lot harder to find and more popular.

Well, if you went back and took a picture in the same conditions you wouldn't have the CA caused by it any more



Chris that odd thick line seems to be present in both images so I'm not sure why it is so strikingly different to the rest of the horizon :S

I think the contrast boos is fine, the white balance seems a little off on my screen though (too warm). Although if I remember correctly on the one sunny afternoon we had the sandstone was(is) very yellow indeed. Overall we had dull weather that July in 1996.

The correction of the sea on the left looks a bit odd. I would have cloned the top of the horizon from the other sire and used it as it is over saturated and looks like an odd thick line.

By the way, do you have one of 'London bridge'?