All Forum Comments
Comment by The_archaeologist posted on Help with RAW at 22/08/2012 - 21:24
PEF Is the pentax file extension for its own raw files Mate.
DNG is adobes file extension for raw files.
Comment by The_archaeologist posted on Help with RAW at 22/08/2012 - 21:18
Prey tell (for the benefit of this technologically 'Cretaceous period' individual)what the hell is PEF?
Comment by The_archaeologist posted on Help with RAW at 22/08/2012 - 20:58
Comment by The_archaeologist posted on What type of Hawk is this? at 05/08/2012 - 16:00
Its possibly a Buzzard,
Comment by The_archaeologist posted on What type of Hawk is this? at 05/08/2012 - 15:06
Nonetheless for any minor niggles, she's a definite throwback to the halcyon days of the 35mm SLR with ample dimensions to grasp and a distinct 'Tonka Toy' feel to her.
... And as such I also feel my wallet being inexorably drawn towards the dark side of my bank balance
Comment by The_archaeologist posted on Pentax K-30 in depth review at 24/07/2012 - 20:27
What is readily apparent to my far from experienced eyes, however, is the lack of a tech/info panel on the top. I have to ask myself why such a universally appropriate 'quick glance' info panel is now missing and why Pentax have chosen to give, yet at the same time take away.
Would this have anything to do with market forces perhaps...is this Pentax trying to generate and expanded a market force within their own 'across the range' selection.
The K30 is clearly not an evolved K5, rather it is a subtle sideways movement with enough bait on the hook to lure a few more beer tokens from a percentage of the photographic massive.
If you wish to argue otherwise J.R then please do feel free to challenge such a view.
Comment by The_archaeologist posted on Pentax K-30 in depth review at 21/07/2012 - 20:24
Do I really need to keep all my RAW as well as my converted jpeg files ?
Up till now I have kept them all but with the amount I shoot and the size of RAW files I question if there's a need.
Is the argument not that once I've done my editing I have the pics as I want them and am unlikely to want to go back and re edit so why keep them ?
From one 'bloke with some cameras' to another I would suggest that you don't dump the originals. On the basis that we never stop learning and the fact that post processing programs are ever evolving, you will undoubtedly find that somewhere along the line your enhanced images can be tweaked even further.
Store the originals on a remote device and stow them in a safe place thereafter. Job done.
Bob.
Comment by The_archaeologist posted on A question for fellow RAW shooters at 21/07/2012 - 19:07
Might be looking for Rotterdam
Comment by The_archaeologist posted on Another pointless thread at 21/07/2012 - 18:15
The first Parakeet and the woodpecker momentarily stopped eating, looked at the new arrival and after passing what I swear was a knowing look between each other, promptly went back to their feasting.
Like I said, I didn't chop any wood, but then neither did I have my Pentax and newly acquired Sigma 500 lens to hand either...
...Bugger!!
Comment by The_archaeologist posted on Another pointless thread at 16/07/2012 - 20:40

