SteveEveritt

Joined: 14th November 2009

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

SteveEveritt
Very true Charlotte, at last I will have some distance between camera and subject, well a bit more than 2-4 inches anyway.

Stuey , as a first go I am stoked, I still can't believe no-one snapped it up, and mightily pleased they didn't.

Comment by SteveEveritt posted on Sigma APO Macro 180mm f2.8 MF samples at 04/11/2011 - 22:09

SteveEveritt
+ 1 for the 55-300, great lens if only Pentax would produce it WR

Comment by SteveEveritt posted on Pentax 50-200 or 55-300? at 04/11/2011 - 19:09

SteveEveritt
About 4 hours if completely flat, but if they are in the charger it will automatically turn itself off once charging is complete. If the light is off the battery is not receiving charge. I have two, one is left in the charger all the time until the one I'm using is flat then I swap.

Comment by SteveEveritt posted on Charging time at 04/11/2011 - 18:33

SteveEveritt
Caught this snail traversing the grand canyon, OK the gap between two bricks. Took the shots with the 180 macro and boy is this going to be a fun lens. I should have increased the F stop a little to get more in focus but I wanted to see what it would be like wide open. One of the shots (or maybe two is at f4) the other(s) f2.8, natural light and hand held.

1
Comment Image


2
Comment Image


3
Comment Image

Comment by SteveEveritt posted on Sigma APO Macro 180mm f2.8 MF samples at 04/11/2011 - 18:27

SteveEveritt
good point Barrie, I didn't think of that

Comment by SteveEveritt posted on please i need help with cs3 raw ? at 03/11/2011 - 22:04

SteveEveritt
You need the Camera Raw 6.3 (or later) plugin available from Adobe's site

Comment by SteveEveritt posted on please i need help with cs3 raw ? at 03/11/2011 - 21:59

SteveEveritt
Sorry Mike, I missed your comment from earlier, you are correct it is 1:2 which is supposed to signify it's not true macro but I've been reading articles about getting longer macro lenses and getting a better working distance and when I saw this I thought all my Christmas's had come at once. But was wary about buying it as it is old then when no-one bought I felt justified in not jumping in at £299. It was on eBay for months when I noticed the make an offer option appear so I offered £210, and he took it. I suppose I am asking for reassurance that I have not spent too much.

Comment by SteveEveritt posted on How good is this Sigma? at 02/11/2011 - 18:40

SteveEveritt
I'm confused now but in answer to the IF question, it is and as I normally use a Pentax A f1.7 50mm on tubes I am mostly right on top of my subjects and most of them get scared off. However I have developed a very stealthy approach as a consequence.
Interesting point about the 2x TC, I have a Kenko with the contacts (but they don't work) but it does give some very good results with a quality fast lens attached.

Comment by SteveEveritt posted on How good is this Sigma? at 02/11/2011 - 18:32

SteveEveritt
Apparently it is 1:2 not 1:1 but that's not going to make much difference, is it?

Comment by SteveEveritt posted on How good is this Sigma? at 31/10/2011 - 22:22

SteveEveritt
Nice set Mat, worth the wait.

Comment by SteveEveritt posted on Underwater adventures! at 31/10/2011 - 22:15

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo