All Forum Comments
Comment by Stephen posted on 300mm f3.5* A - Did this lens ever exist? at 13/11/2003 - 09:53
Comment by Stephen posted on Pentax Optio S- User feedback at 11/11/2003 - 22:03
If all of this is ok then the next thing is to check the camera settings and shutter. Was the film speed set correctly? if set too fast this may have caused severe under exposure.
Check the shutter operation - with the back of the camera open (and the lens on maximum aperture) fire the shutter and you should see the shutter open / close (and see a quick burst of light from the lens). If the shutter is not operating I am afraid it is a repair needed.
Let us know how you get on.
Regards
Comment by Stephen posted on Espio 110 - Broken film load door at 10/11/2003 - 07:56
The MX is a more rugged camera than the ME Super, it only relies on batteries for the meter so you are less likely to miss that all important shot!
You haven't mentioned the type of photography you are interested in - if you require a motor drive, again the MX has the advantage witha choice of a 2 fps winder or a 5 fps motor drive (though these are now rarer thean LX's).
I use all three of these cameras on a regular basis, the LX is definitely my favourite but the MX is not far behind. This is not saying that the ME Super is anything other than a great camera - just a personal preference
Comment by Stephen posted on Pentax LX at 04/11/2003 - 07:45
When you select a depth of field preview the lens aperture shuts down to that which will be used for the exposure, this will make the image in the viewfinder darker (the smaller the aperture the darker the image). With the lens 'stopped down' in this way you can see exactly what is in focus (providing the image isn't too dark!). This is particularly useful when trying to guage the correct focus point to gain the maximum area in focus.
Hope this helps
Comment by Stephen posted on Can someone please explain the depth of field preview thing at 14/08/2003 - 23:04
Comment by Stephen posted on Need detail informations (m-system) at 13/07/2003 - 07:44
I have used both the Winder ME and Winder ME 11 on my collection of ME / ME Super / MG and MV1 cameras. From new several of these cameras would have had extensive use (upwards of 200 rolls of film in the first few years) with the winder attached (I found the winder improved the handling) and have not suffered any failures in either the winders or the cameras. I understand your concern but from my own experience I think it unlikely that the use of the winder would cause any undue additional stress to the camera body.
Comment by Stephen posted on Me/ME Super with winder at 09/07/2003 - 21:22
Comment by Stephen posted on camera insurance advice at 09/07/2003 - 21:05
Thanks for your 2 cents - I think your opinions / experience is worth considerably more! I am currently tracking a secondhand 360, so fingers crossed I should be able to let you know my initial thoughts in a couple of weeks.
Cheers
Steve
Comment by Stephen posted on Af 360 FGZ Flash at 14/09/2003 - 16:26

