smudge

Joined: 24th November 2010

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

smudge
Comment Image
Comment Image


I hope this is not straying too far from the subject under consideration. These shots were taken in Pitlochry on a dull wet day in late October. As taken they were flat and dull so I cranked up the saturation to almost 'plant catalogue' levels to bring out the colours in the foliage. I would be interested in your views - do these look natural or have I overcooked them?

Comment by smudge posted on Too bright, too dark, Just Right at 01/06/2013 - 11:39

smudge
Comment Image


On the other hand, this Edinburgh shot was taken on a dull day and required a bit of tweaking to match what my eye was seeing.

Comment by smudge posted on Too bright, too dark, Just Right at 31/05/2013 - 11:57

smudge
Comment Image


O.k. this is from a visit to Chatsworth, end of May last year. A glorious sunny day. This image seems to me to be a 'natural' representation of the scene.

Comment by smudge posted on Too bright, too dark, Just Right at 31/05/2013 - 11:47

smudge
Comment Image


Leaves unfurling on an Acer in the back garden. I like the bokeh on this. K10d with FA50 1.4.

Comment by smudge posted on It Has A Bokeh.... at 30/05/2013 - 21:38

smudge
Comment Image
I have applied an excessive amount of sharpening to this version...I don't know why this is needed...the original full size image needed no additional sharpening at all

Comment by smudge posted on Tangmere on the Anniversary Fenman at 25/05/2013 - 09:47

smudge
Comment Image
Taken at 7.15 a.m. today. Tangmere replaced Oliver Cromwell on The Anniversary Fenman from Liverpool Street to Norwich and Kings Lynn. Seen here at speed at my local station, Forest Gate. The first time I have seen this loco in action.

K5II with FA43mm

edit: plainly something I am doing, or not doing, is softening the image considerably compared to the original. I'll have another go...

Comment by smudge posted on Tangmere on the Anniversary Fenman at 25/05/2013 - 09:38

smudge
If you can stretch to about £350 then an older version of the Sigma 150-500 would be a safe choice. You may find the earlier Sigma 170-500 for a little less but I'm not sure how the IQ compares. Even if you do not mind manual focus I cannot think of a quality 500mm that you will find for less. Perhaps some other members will know of something.
(sorry, cross posted with Mike)

Comment by smudge posted on 500 Telephoto advice for K100d. at 22/05/2013 - 18:20

smudge
This happens quite a lot on the Microglobe site. Usually it is only the high price listing that is 'in stock'. The low price listing is just a teaser...

Comment by smudge posted on pentax smc d-fa 100mm f2.8 wr macro £379.00 at 20/05/2013 - 22:15

smudge
Comment Image


Just to assist the comparison here is the FA 31mm alongside the Sigma 24mm 1.8 which is just slightly smaller than the new Sigma 35. I suspect that compact size may be the only advantage of the Pentax over the Sigma but it is a significant difference, particularly if you want to slip a fast prime into the corner of your bag when travelling. (Oh and apologies for the dodgy quality of the shot, it was taken in a hurry :shock

Comment by smudge posted on Sigma Receives TIPA Awards at 11/05/2013 - 16:35

smudge
The Sigma is much larger than the FA31 and almost twice the weight - heavier than a DA 16-50.

Comment by smudge posted on Sigma Receives TIPA Awards at 11/05/2013 - 09:30

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo