Sigma Receives TIPA Awards

puma
Posted 07/05/2013 - 23:42 Link
see link
PPG link
Snootchies
Posted 08/05/2013 - 07:37 Link
Thanks for sharing - the 35mm 1.4 interests me, especially since (I think) it is full frame too. Hope it comes to Pentax mount...
Bob

My website (Hadfield Photography)

Pentax Gallery Artist page:link

Flickr Photostream: link
Jonathan-Mac
Posted 08/05/2013 - 08:36 Link
I didn't know TIPA awards were given to anything but third party superzooms.
Pentax hybrid user - Digital K3, film 645 and 35mm SLR and Pentax (&other) lenses adapted to Fuji X and Panasonic L digital
Fan of DA limited and old manual lenses
matwhittington
Posted 08/05/2013 - 20:53 Link
I think the 35mm f1.4 is now in Pentax mount - or just about. If you look on the Sigma page under 'lens construction and outline' tab, there is a barcode referenced for a Pentax mount:

link

and it is in Pentax mount on amazon, although apparently shipping is 1 to 3 weeks...

It is very tempting although I have barred myself from buying any new lenses as I am moving house and need all the cash I can get

Cheers
Mat W

My Flickr: link
Frogfish
Posted 10/05/2013 - 09:55 Link
The Sigma 35/1.4 has already being lauded as the best 35mm lens you can buy for Nikon / Canon .... everybody is raving about it on the forums. So if it is now in PK mount you really should look no further for the best AF 35mm out there ! That said maybe the 31mm is better for your particular photography

I haven't used the 35mm but I bought the also superb 50/1.4 straight off the bat knowing how good the 30/1.4 is in PK mount (not for landcapes).

Sigma have some stunning lenses now (120-300/2.8, 85/1.4, 50/1.4, 35/1.4 and upcoming 135/1. so it doesn't surprise me at all to see them starting to win awards. They deserve it as they are blowing the camera manufacturers own lenses away with this latest generation. Huge kudos to the son who took over the company and is the driving force behind this.
http://frogfish.smugmug.com/ Pentax. Pentax DA*300/4, Cosina 55/1.2, Lens Baby Composer Pro & Edge 80, AFA x1.7, Metz 50 af1.
Nikon. D800. D600. Sigma 500/4.5, Nikon 300/2.8 VRII, Sigma 120-300/2.8, Zeiss Distagon ZF2 21/2.8, Zeiss Distagon ZF2 35/2.0, Sigma 50/1.4, Nikkor 85/1.8, Nikon TC20EIII, Nikon TC14EII, Kenko x1.4, Sigma 2.0
Edited by Frogfish: 10/05/2013 - 09:59
generator
Posted 10/05/2013 - 11:18 Link
I have heard that Sigma and Pentax fell out over this and there will not be a PK mount?? and made the deal with Nikon,Canon and some others.
Quote:
Sigma have some stunning lenses now (120-300/2.8, 85/1.4, 50/1.4, 35/1.4 and upcoming 135/1. so it doesn't surprise me at all to see them starting to win awards.
thats so true and are Pentax going to miss out thats teh real question

Maybe some one can tell us if this is the truth or just hear say
Thanks Richard
Edited by generator: 10/05/2013 - 11:20
wvbarnes
Posted 10/05/2013 - 12:55 Link
WEX have the Pentax mount for pre-order as well as the listing on the Sigma UK site.
Posted 10/05/2013 - 20:41 Link
£700 must be good,..,.,.
wvbarnes wrote:
WEX have the Pentax mount for pre-order as well as the listing on the Sigma UK site.
major
Posted 10/05/2013 - 22:20 Link
The Sigma 35/1.4 has already being lauded as the best 35mm lens you can buy for Nikon / Canon .... everybody is raving about it on the forums. So if it is now in PK mount you really should look no further for the best AF 35mm out there ! That said maybe the 31mm is better for your particular photography - Quote from 'Frogfish'.

As a matter of interest (once I've amassed a small fortune...in years to come!) , which one would be a better buy on balance (leaving cost and weather-proofing out of the equation) and why?

Regards,

JC
Frogfish
Posted 10/05/2013 - 22:59 Link
major wrote:
The Sigma 35/1.4 has already being lauded as the best 35mm lens you can buy for Nikon / Canon .... everybody is raving about it on the forums. So if it is now in PK mount you really should look no further for the best AF 35mm out there ! That said maybe the 31mm is better for your particular photography - Quote from 'Frogfish'.

As a matter of interest (once I've amassed a small fortune...in years to come!) , which one would be a better buy on balance (leaving cost and weather-proofing out of the equation) and why?

Regards,

JC
Interesting question JC. The 35mm has sharp corners, virtually no distortion, great on CA/PF. super fast AF and is incredibly sharp (Google it - lots of tests results out for it already). Whether it renders like the 31mm is another question.

Probably the 35mm will shade the venerable 31mm in some areas but a lot may come down to personal preference .. and of course these are both full frame lenses so when used on (for example) a K5ii then you have trimmed borders and corners off already for even better performance but at the cost of width.
http://frogfish.smugmug.com/ Pentax. Pentax DA*300/4, Cosina 55/1.2, Lens Baby Composer Pro & Edge 80, AFA x1.7, Metz 50 af1.
Nikon. D800. D600. Sigma 500/4.5, Nikon 300/2.8 VRII, Sigma 120-300/2.8, Zeiss Distagon ZF2 21/2.8, Zeiss Distagon ZF2 35/2.0, Sigma 50/1.4, Nikkor 85/1.8, Nikon TC20EIII, Nikon TC14EII, Kenko x1.4, Sigma 2.0
major
Posted 11/05/2013 - 00:13 Link
High praise, indeed, from all the reviews I've read so far, Kevin !

Your remarks about it being a full frame lens is well worth bearing in mind. On paper the 35 mm would appear to be better value for most prospective buyers, I suspect.

I shall await with trepidation Pentax user reviews...provided Sigma does produce them in P mount, of course!
percy
Posted 11/05/2013 - 07:14 Link
Unfortunately cost comes into it as well. The 35 is already listed at about 2/3rds of the price of a 31, and it's likely that will drop a little in months to come. If it is that good, then it becomes a bit of a no brainer.
Then again, maybe that will force the price of the 31 down, if we get lucky
smudge
Posted 11/05/2013 - 09:30 Link
The Sigma is much larger than the FA31 and almost twice the weight - heavier than a DA 16-50.
Regards, Philip
percy
Posted 11/05/2013 - 10:21 Link
smudge wrote:
The Sigma is much larger than the FA31 and almost twice the weight - heavier than a DA 16-50.
I agree - I much prefer the size and weight of the 31, and it is a lens on my wish list. But a £300+ difference is significant, so the Sigma will warrant serious consideration.
smudge
Posted 11/05/2013 - 16:35 Link
Comment Image


Just to assist the comparison here is the FA 31mm alongside the Sigma 24mm 1.8 which is just slightly smaller than the new Sigma 35. I suspect that compact size may be the only advantage of the Pentax over the Sigma but it is a significant difference, particularly if you want to slip a fast prime into the corner of your bag when travelling. (Oh and apologies for the dodgy quality of the shot, it was taken in a hurry :shock
Regards, Philip
Edited by smudge: 11/05/2013 - 16:37

Add Comment

To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo