sam-joseph

Joined: 22nd September 2009

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

sam-joseph
I wouldn't mind having a look at one of those Samyang 85's. It's a pity they didn't engineer another half turn into the focus ring to make it a macro. Hmmm. 85mm f1.4 macro, now THAT'S a lens.
Regards

Comment by sam-joseph posted on looking for a 1.4 or 1.8 prtrait lens at 31/05/2010 - 11:26

sam-joseph
The word "Bum"is derived from the olde English "Bottome Upon Meerglutes".
Meerglutes, of course, being a bastardisation of the term "Glutes", which refers to the upper leg muscles. The Romans would call their adversaries "Bum-Holios", before battle, as a taunt to begin the fighting. No-one really knows what this term meant, though the ensuing battle was no doubt fierce. In modern times, the term "Bum" has become an endearing moniker for the posterior, or arse end of a person or beast. Moreover, our American friends often refer to T*** and A** when descibing their wanton lust for intimate company. This is, of course, all complete shite that I've just made up. Don't be bummed by it.
Regards

Comment by sam-joseph posted on Bum at 28/05/2010 - 13:08

sam-joseph
Mr. Berg, I've just commented on the gallery that it's strange the photo wasn't classed as adult content. That was a joke. Who in their right mind would find offence in the works of the so-called Masters? There's nothing wrong with boobs, in my view. If this were a real woman standing in this pose, albeit with arms, it'd still be a great shot.
Well done.

Edit: typos.

Comment by sam-joseph posted on Boobs at 28/05/2010 - 12:52

sam-joseph
I'd just like a black KX, with those little red focus point indicators in the viewfinder.
Regards

Comment by sam-joseph posted on Are Pentax getting carried away with coloured cameras?? at 19/05/2010 - 12:06

sam-joseph
Ingerlich never done me no good.
Regards

Comment by sam-joseph posted on Another pointless thread at 18/05/2010 - 12:47

sam-joseph
Crikey Carl, look at the major drama your post has caused! People arguing about others buying choices....
Anyway, good luck in your future photographic endeavours.As long as you're taking pictures, who cares what you're using? Just don't try to tell me your Canon is better than my Pentax. OK?
Regards

Comment by sam-joseph posted on Time to say goodbye at 17/05/2010 - 10:48

sam-joseph
That's right. No self respecting Aussie would drink that crap. We're all drinking Heineken/Grolsch/Carlsberg etc. these days.
Regards

Comment by sam-joseph posted on Another pointless thread at 17/05/2010 - 10:36

sam-joseph
I had a motorcycle three years ago. A Suzuki DR650. Went like the clappers. One morning, riding it to work, a mail delivery van went through a roundabout and cleaned me up. Five days in hospital, a wrist reconstruction, 45mm screw in the ankle, and I'm almost good as new. Bike is a write off, as was my sanity. Now I've rediscovered the camera. You could say the Pentax DSLR has partially saved me. At least the socks are OK.
Regards

Comment by sam-joseph posted on Another pointless thread at 15/05/2010 - 11:18

sam-joseph
Enjoy your "new"lens, Mr. Smegg. I have one, it's possibly the cheapest lens I have ever bought, and the best!. Whenever I put the 50mm f1.7, or the Takumar 135 on my camera, I know I've got a better-than-even chance of taking a good picture.
Regards

Comment by sam-joseph posted on For sale: Pentax-A 50mm 1:1.7 at 15/05/2010 - 11:13

sam-joseph
I've read the Vivitar 100 macro series 1 is a beauty. If anyone has got one.....
Regards

Comment by sam-joseph posted on Very Vivitar. at 15/05/2010 - 11:05

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo