sam-joseph

Joined: 22nd September 2009

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

sam-joseph
Hello Bill. Welcome to the forum.

Regards

Comment by sam-joseph posted on new guy here at 28/01/2011 - 11:03

sam-joseph
Alright, I know this is a different lens entirely, but I thought I'd let you guys know about this one. It's an M-100mm f4 macro, which the guy is advertising as an M42 Takumar. The blurb says it's for parts or not working, but the truth is, there's a bit of fungus on the front element.
I don't have the budget for it at the moment (and I'm after the f2.8 A-series version anyway), so go for it!

link

Regards

Comment by sam-joseph posted on Anyone want a Bigma? at 26/01/2011 - 09:45

sam-joseph
G'day. (I have to say that, as it's Australia Day today).
I recently bought an M-50 f2 on ebay, which is the cheapest of the 50's. Cost me about $30 (20 quid), and a cheap reversing ring from China, $8.
So far I'm impressed with the results. I still need to crop down, but even though I'm using a 6MP K100D Super, the results still aren't too bad. I'll be ordering the cheapy $10 extension tubes soon.
The crucial element is flash. I'm using an old AF200SA Pentax flash, with a high-tech tissue and rubber band diffuser. Single layer tissue setting.

Here's a link, if I can work out how to do it...


Regardslink

Comment by sam-joseph posted on What prime lens for Macro Tubes? at 26/01/2011 - 01:46

sam-joseph
Tell you what. I'll give you $50 for the 16-50, then see if I can straighten it with the smack of a hammer. (I'm a fitter after all)
Regards

Comment by sam-joseph posted on Why a 50-135 SDM is better than a 16-50 SDM at 23/01/2011 - 02:42

sam-joseph
I have a laser level, with a tripod socket on the bottom. Does that count? Otherwise, spare rechargeable AA's, a rocket blower and something else, the name of which currently escapes me.
Regards

Comment by sam-joseph posted on Must Have Photography Accessories? at 22/01/2011 - 11:26

sam-joseph
So that's what the K-r can do, eh? That's it, then. I'm getting one.
Regards

Comment by sam-joseph posted on Some more with the K-r - Southbank at 22/01/2011 - 01:59

sam-joseph
I use Powerex 2700mAh, as recommended by a pro photographer in an English photo mag. I've also got Sony CycleEnergy 2400mAh, and Eneloop 2000mAh. They all seem fine, with the Powerex's top of the list.
Regards

Comment by sam-joseph posted on Which AA batteries for K-x?? at 21/01/2011 - 03:21

sam-joseph
Happy new year all. 2010 brought me many great manual focus lenses, hopefully 2011 will bring a star lens or two.
Regards

Comment by sam-joseph posted on 2011 at 01/01/2011 - 09:47

sam-joseph
"Who's a good puppy dog? Yes, you are. Yes, you are!"
Sorry, just got carried away with your first pic there. These results look fine to me. A 50mm f1.4 for 30 quid you say? Sounds like a deal to me. Can't beat those older lenses for build quality/contrast/sharpness/colour rendition(particularly the Pentax lenses), and most importantly, value for money.
Regards

Comment by sam-joseph posted on Chinon 50mm f1.4 Sharpness at 27/12/2010 - 10:22

sam-joseph
Hi there and welcome.
I'm a bit perplaxed as to why you've acquired a flagship model K5, and are now seeking 30 year old lenses at bargain basement prices. Seems to me, if you've got the budget for a K5, you should have a 50-135 hanging off the front of it. Regardless, Pentax is a brand where you CAN buy the latest model camera body, whack an M series 200 f4, 135 f3.5, or A-50 f1.7 on, and enjoy fantastic results not available with even the most modern plasticy overpriced variants. Any of those lenses mentioned will produce great results with a bit of care, and are plentiful and relatively cheap on ebay. Good luck with the LBA (Lens Buying Addiction), these manual lenses are the trigger for that incurable addiction.
Regards

Comment by sam-joseph posted on lenses confused at 24/12/2010 - 10:23

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo