Pity Firefox doesn't identify Firfox as a mis-spelling though

Now Sold. Thanks

If you would like to set up 11. I would gladly volunteer to pose as the "Playboy Photographer" - of course you'll need to hire actual Playboy models to make it convincing.

Make one and I'll let you know I'd prefer to sell it on here than go on ebay, so try me.

Especially with the weather we've been having. Some nice long shadows appearing now as the sun drops but it's all too late.

Lovely saturation, has a film quality to it. What lens were these taken with ?

Enter it anyway... all bar 3 have no exif & Johns was shot in 2005 !

And yes, I do appear to be paying too much attention

At last ! An entry with exif data.

RAW is an unfettled image Ted. It allows you to manually control the amount of noise reduction & sharpening etc that you apply to the image.

A jpeg comes out of the camera with these already applied according to the type of output selected. Whilst this may be ok for many shots, it treats all shots the same whereas you can use your judgement & the considerably more powerful software & hardware that a PC (or mac) provides you with.
It takes practice to get it right, but will yield better results than jpeg when you master it.

Looks okay to me Mike. The Raw is pretty sharp as it is, the 2nd conversion looks very sharp but not oversharpened.

Edit: Now seems to have disappeared strangely.