pnjmcc

Joined: 11th October 2007

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

pnjmcc
This was my take on it Givingtree.

With a little more time an effort I could have put the splits in different or less distracting places and lined things up a little better (ie her arm on the L/H side) I am also not all that keen on the border colours, (I wanted match the colours in the image to it)
anyway, I hope you like it

[IMG]http://i206.photobucket.com/albums/bb113/pnjmcc/Happy-color4tonesplit.jpg[/IMG]

Regards
PaulM

Comment by pnjmcc posted on technically terrible at 24/02/2010 - 23:16

pnjmcc
Good shots Kris, I like them both

womble wrote:
The kit lens is highly variable in quality, I was lucky that I got a very good example with my K10D which has negated my desire to buy a DA* 16-50 or a DA 16-45. I don't mind not having the extra 2mm as I have the 12-24mm, and the DA* 50-135mm covers the longer end. I am surprised how many of my shots are taken with the "humble" Mk I kit lens. I shan't part with it in a hurry.

K.
I have always like this kit lens too, every time I have used mine at the wide end for shots like that it has produced pretty good results, in fact the only thing that lets it down is my eye ! I didn't realise they varied in quality though

Regards
PaulM

Comment by pnjmcc posted on Central Park at 24/02/2010 - 00:32

pnjmcc
I really like the first one, it has a kind of an 70s/80s polaroid style to it which the purpleness enhances.

As technoblurb said the models ease infornt of the lens really adds to this shot and I think thats what is lifting it

I also had a play with it too. I conveted it to a B&W, did some burning on the front of her hair to get rid of the misty bits added some blur to push the background, tree and whispy bits of hair further OOF and then toned it in sections, it kinda works to my eye anyway.

Its definatley worth a play in photoshop (or what ever you use)

Regards
PaulM

Comment by pnjmcc posted on technically terrible at 24/02/2010 - 00:25

pnjmcc
Thanks guys,

Yes the lens was fully open at f2.8 and fully extended (focus wise) 1/125 with the samsung SEF36PZF and my plastic milk container & tinfoil diffuser

It is a lovely sharp lens though.

Regards
PaulM

Comment by pnjmcc posted on Samsung 100mm Macro shots at 23/02/2010 - 23:25

pnjmcc
Definately the first pic.

I find the mast draws my eye to it and away from the chinook.

Regards
PaulM

Comment by pnjmcc posted on With or without mast? at 23/02/2010 - 03:34

pnjmcc
Hi All,

This is my first real play with this lens and I love the shapness but cant help thinking I can get a better DoF with the older manual smc 50 macro and extention. Maybe its because I have had it for longer and more comfortable/ used to using it.

Anyway C&Cs welcome

Some prawn tails, I really liked the colours in this one
[IMG]http://i206.photobucket.com/albums/bb113/pnjmcc/prawn-tails2--web.jpg[/IMG]

A small lizard thingy, You can really see the shallow DoF in this on
[IMG]http://i206.photobucket.com/albums/bb113/pnjmcc/IMGP7705-web.jpg[/IMG]

Regards
PaulM

Comment by pnjmcc posted on Samsung 100mm Macro shots at 22/02/2010 - 23:32

pnjmcc
Darkmunk wrote:
At one point I forgot myself and removed the lens in front of the toms with the camera still switched on.... probably sucked a cazillion little babies onto the sensor


Great shots thought, Is it difficult to compose?

Regards
PaulM

Comment by pnjmcc posted on more of the fun guy at 22/02/2010 - 22:05

pnjmcc
Dr. Mhuni wrote:
I like all three. Though how 'bad' were they in the first place?! It would be interesting to see the originals.
Good point Dr Mhuni,

The originals are below
1) before applying the Orton effect
[IMG]http://i206.photobucket.com/albums/bb113/pnjmcc/original-for-web.jpg[/IMG]
2) before the hi key effect
[IMG]http://i206.photobucket.com/albums/bb113/pnjmcc/self-portrait-original-for-web.jpg[/IMG]
3) before cross processing effect
[IMG]http://i206.photobucket.com/albums/bb113/pnjmcc/thumb_17022010017copy.jpg[/IMG]

Regards
PaulM

Comment by pnjmcc posted on Post processing to match content and save an image? at 21/02/2010 - 23:12

pnjmcc
davidtrout wrote:
Feel free Paul.
david
It took a bit of time but heres my "Pop Art" style take on davids toilet in classic Any warhol style

[IMG]http://i206.photobucket.com/albums/bb113/pnjmcc/AS-web2.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i206.photobucket.com/albums/bb113/pnjmcc/AS-web1.jpg[/IMG]

Regards
PaulM

Comment by pnjmcc posted on Entries for Fortnightly Competition # 35 - "Design Icon" at 21/02/2010 - 23:01

pnjmcc
Father Ted wrote:
pnjmcc wrote:


So are you up for it Father Ted?

Regards
PaulM
No promises, depends on time and oppurtunites. But; go on! I'll see what I can do
No, No promises here either but I am going to give it my best this time.

I might try to take out the tripod and instead of trying to be discrete I am going to stand out and try to look like I am taking a picture of a building/landmark etc and then just shoot down the street

Regards
PaulM

Comment by pnjmcc posted on Discussion on Fortnightly Competition # 36 - "People" at 18/02/2010 - 23:52

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo