With or without mast?


alun

Link Posted 22/02/2010 - 22:56


IMG]I felt that the mast added drama by emphasising the proximity of the chinook, but it has been suggested it is distracting.
Which of the two do you prefer?
Last Edited by alun on 22/02/2010 - 23:10

alun

Link Posted 22/02/2010 - 23:08


This is the second image - it did not want to load on the first post.

Greytop

Link Posted 23/02/2010 - 00:45
I prefer the image without the post. Still looks pretty close to me.
Regards Huw

flickr

womble

Link Posted 23/02/2010 - 00:58
I prefer without. I find the mast distracting especially as it isn't immediately obvious what it is.

K.
Kris Lockyear
It is an illusion that photos are made with the camera… they are made with the eye, heart and head. Henri Cartier-Bresson
Lots of film bodies, a couple of digital ones, too many lenses (mainly older glass) and a Horseman LE 5x4.

My website

pnjmcc

Link Posted 23/02/2010 - 03:34
Definately the first pic.

I find the mast draws my eye to it and away from the chinook.

Regards
PaulM
All cameras are equal but.....
Some are more equal than others

Hyram

Link Posted 23/02/2010 - 08:35
I like it with the mast and I would be somewhat alarmed if a Chinook ever came that close to the top of my mast
Hyram

Bodies: K20D (2), K10D, Super A, ME Super, Auto 110 SLR, X70, Optio P70
Pentax Glass: DA* 300, DA* 60-250, DA* 50-135, DA* 16-50, DA 70 Ltd, FA 31 Ltd, DA 35 Ltd, DA 18-55 (2), DA 12-24, DA 10-17, M 200, A 35-70, M 40, M 28, Converter-A 2X-S, 1.4X-S, AF 1.7, Pentax-110 50, Pentax-110 24
Other Glass: Sigma 105 macro, Sigma-A APO 75-300
Flash: Metz 58 AF-1 P, Pentax AF160FC ringflash, Pentax AF280T

Father Ted

Link Posted 23/02/2010 - 09:01
Without the mast for me. I think it makes the image too cluttered.
(IMHO)
Getting there! Thanks to you guys

Pentax K10d, *istDL, Kit lens ( 18-55mm ), 50mm f1.7 lens, Tamron 70-300mm lens, Prinzflex 70-162 manual lens, Various old flashes.

thoughton

Link Posted 23/02/2010 - 09:30
No mast for me too. If it was a bit smaller maybe, but that thing is enormous
Tim
AF - Pentax K5, Sigma 10-20/4-5.6, Tamron 17-50/2.8, Sigma 30/1.4, Sigma 70-200/2.8, Tamron 70-300/4-5.6
MF - Vivitar CF 28/2.8, Tamron AD2 90/2.5, MTO 1000/11
Stuff - Metz 58 AF1, Cactus v4, Nikon SB24, Raynox 150, Sigma 1.4x TC, Sigma 2x TC, Kenko 2x macro TC, Redsnapper 283 tripod, iMac 27”, Macbook Pro 17”, iPad, iPhone 3G
Flickr • Fluidr • PPG • Street • Portfolio site
Feel free to edit any of my posted photos! If I post a photo for critique, I want brutal honesty. If you don't like it, please say so and tell me why!

bwlchmawr

Link Posted 23/02/2010 - 09:31
I can see what you were trying to do and the second one's good, but the uncluttered appearance of no.1 is the better photo.

Regards,

Andrew
Best wishes,

Andrew

"These places mean something and it's the job of a photographer to figure-out what the hell it is."
Robert Adams
"The camera doesn't make a bit of difference.  All of them can record what you are seeing.  But, you have to SEE."
Ernst Hass
My website: http://www.ephotozine.com/user/bwlchmawr-199050 http://s927.photobucket.com/home/ADC3440/index
https://www.flickr.com/photos/78898196@N05

alun

Link Posted 23/02/2010 - 20:05
Looks like the mast must go.
Thanks for all your comments.

Hyram

Link Posted 23/02/2010 - 21:44
thoughton wrote:
No mast for me too. If it was a bit smaller maybe, but that thing is enormous

Relatively small for a mast

alun wrote:
Looks like the mast must go.

Shame
Hyram

Bodies: K20D (2), K10D, Super A, ME Super, Auto 110 SLR, X70, Optio P70
Pentax Glass: DA* 300, DA* 60-250, DA* 50-135, DA* 16-50, DA 70 Ltd, FA 31 Ltd, DA 35 Ltd, DA 18-55 (2), DA 12-24, DA 10-17, M 200, A 35-70, M 40, M 28, Converter-A 2X-S, 1.4X-S, AF 1.7, Pentax-110 50, Pentax-110 24
Other Glass: Sigma 105 macro, Sigma-A APO 75-300
Flash: Metz 58 AF-1 P, Pentax AF160FC ringflash, Pentax AF280T
Add a Comment
You must be registered or logged-in to comment.