Pentaxophile

Joined: 6th May 2009

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

Pentaxophile
The exif page is here: link

Unsurprisingly it's f8... my default aperture setting!

I take your point about DOF effects, as the focus is on the shore, not the hill... but the blurring seemed strange, not like the normal OOF effect. And it seems worse at the top on the left hand side than on the more distant cliffs on the middle right. Perhaps the DOF effects are exacerbating some problem with the lens?

Comment Image


The focus is further back in this one (warning full size): link, and you can see that the more distant parts of the hill on the right hand side are much sharper than the parts of the hill at the top of the frame,.

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on 16-45mm not behaving itself? at 03/02/2011 - 18:15

Pentaxophile
A CCTV lens with a sensor no bigger than the average consumer P&S?

Be still, my heart...

I suppose there might be a niche for it, but I struggle to see the point

I hope this rumour is unfounded, although Hoya have released just such a camera through the Kenko brand...

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on kx and k7 both officially discontinued? at 03/02/2011 - 15:28

Pentaxophile
Nooooo!!!!

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on The Optio I-10 at 03/02/2011 - 15:19

Pentaxophile
Has anyone else had an issue with softness towards the top of the frame when shooting in portrait format? I noticed this issue on this shot, and several others, but landscape format shots seem to be fine. I get the impression its not so bad when the camera is flipped 180 degrees too.

Comment Image

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on 16-45mm not behaving itself? at 03/02/2011 - 14:07

Pentaxophile
wadna wrote:
"I love the handling of the K7 but I find the noise a bit of an issue. I find noise becomes apparent st ISO 200, which is the setting I use the most because the D-range setting does not work at ISO 100."
Same story here. The K-7 dynamic range isn't good enough so I also run it at iso200 so as I use the DR expansion all the time. Processing a photo shot the other day at iso200 where the sky was flat produced unacceptable noise. Disappointing.
There are better ways of increasing 'dynamic range' in post processing, preferably using LR3. The DR function slows the camera performance down, does not seem to tackle the noise created by 'pushing ISO' in the shadow areas, and limits you to jpeg which A) are known to show worse noise than RAW files and B) reduces your chance of improving the shot in PP. The K-7 is no friend to the jpeg shooter, at least not one who pixel peeps!

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on How do you find your K7 at 03/02/2011 - 13:49

Pentaxophile
TOZZA27 wrote:
Tee Hee - photographing the Victorian school buildings in Parkgate the other day and Jo said "it`s a pity I don`t have a panoramic feature like my old APS camera"........................................."oh" - said I innocently - "what you need is a 12-24 lens like the one Davex showed me - that gives a great panoramic view and the Xenon version is cheaper than the Pentax"

Time will tell !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Tony
Don't mention that you could get the same effect by just cropping the top and bottom of the image

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Another pointless thread at 03/02/2011 - 11:49

Pentaxophile
VonBatCat wrote:
Dangermouse wrote:
VonBatCat wrote:
Same here had day off to take some waterfall shots. But the thought of standing in cold water up to my cable release put me off.

Maybe next week.
Easy solution - do what I do and use a longer lens!
It was so cold even the lens didn't seem so long.
Had your 60-250mm turned into a DA21mm?

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Another pointless thread at 03/02/2011 - 00:04

Pentaxophile
Smeggypants wrote:
JonSchick wrote:
I'd add Amsterdam into the mix too
me too!!
Hmmm I bet you would

I don't remember much from my visit to that city

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Good European Cities for Photo's! at 02/02/2011 - 23:57

Pentaxophile
I always thought my istDL produced very clean but rather processed looking images when viewed 1:1... in other words a little bit of sharpening and smoothing of detail. This resulted in very punchy images, it must be said! When I look at my old istDL2 shots at web sizes, they are crisp and smooth.

But going up to the K200D really made a vast improvement to the amount of detail. Therefore I would hesitate before saying that the original 6mp sensor was a 'digital classic'

Very nice body though, I'm sure!

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on The quality of the ist DS at 02/02/2011 - 22:35

Pentaxophile
Cocked up my entry slightly - oh well!!!!

But as a whole, there are some great images there. HArd to pick a winner (IMO) so far...

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Discussion Weekly Competition #186 Black & White Landscapes at 02/02/2011 - 22:15

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo