All Forum Comments
Comment by Pentaxophile posted on UWA needed, any ideas? at 27/07/2011 - 18:39
Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Best focal length for party portraits? at 27/07/2011 - 16:11
Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Lowepro Exchange Messenger Courier at 27/07/2011 - 13:44
I'd assume the body only will be but what about the lenses...? and you would need a few of those. I am not sure I am prepared to push that much cash towards a camera with the IQ of a compact and have to maintain two sets of lenses... Let alone that m43 are just as small and with plenty of cheaper bodies and lenses selection.
All that means though that the moment I see one logic will prevail and that is not what normally happens!
If you want discrete ( not scaring people in public ) get a little Sony Cybershot. Latest models have the same sensor as the Q, and are a helluva lot cheaper.
Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Pentax launch the Q at 27/07/2011 - 13:23
Comment by Pentaxophile posted on DarkTable update at 27/07/2011 - 11:54
Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Anyone sell at craft fairs? at 27/07/2011 - 11:47
Comment by Pentaxophile posted on ISO3200 but what body at 27/07/2011 - 09:22
Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Anyone sell at craft fairs? at 27/07/2011 - 08:53
Did I really need video. Went to take some surfing photos on the weekend, with the KR. Thought, this is good I can now just switch to video. Did that, but couldnt see anything on the LCD screen, because of the glare. Thats a bit useless. Could have stayed with the K20D.
My wife suggested, like in the old days, I will have to wear a black hood over the camera and my head if I wanted to take surfing videos. Not a good look on the beach, hiding oneself under a hood. I wonder if Pentax has a accessory black hood with "pentax" emblazoned upon it.
Anybody have any suggestions?
Comment by Pentaxophile posted on K20D to K-R? at 27/07/2011 - 07:51
Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Lowepro Exchange Messenger Courier at 27/07/2011 - 07:44


Something like the DA10-16mm fisheye will cram an even larger field of view in than a 'rectilinear' lens, but obviously the distortion might not be suitable. De-fishing is possible but you end up cropping the image anyway and who wants all that PP work and image degradation. [Edit - sorry you did mention you didn't want fisheye anyway!]