All Forum Comments
Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Would these make good Christmas card covers? at 17/12/2011 - 11:51
That's why I prefer lenses that work at infinity.... usually everything from about 5m to infinity is then in focus.
Anyway what puzzles me is Doug's choice of f8 for the DA35. Why not use f5.6, the same as the Tamron? The actual sweet spot of the DA35 is f4 (according to Photozone.de) although it's pretty consistent between f3.2 and f5.6, and only slightly less sharp at f2.4 and f8, where it is still 'excellent' in the centre and 'very good' at the borders.
Another issue is, I am much more interested in the performance of the lens at f2.4 versus the Tamron, especially at portrait/close up distances. For a landscape shot like the ones in Doug's examples, you'd probably reach for the Tamron unless you were determined to travel light. For a portrait or candid, the DA35 which is less threatening and should offer nicer rendering, is what I would go for.
At f8, sharpness-wise, I shouldn't imagine you could tell it much apart from any decent zoom unless you really pixel peeped (as in Doug's example above - would you really be able to tell those shots apart if you printed them, or resized them for the web? :wink It's the rendering at wider apertures which make a lens like this interesting - to me anyway.
I reckon if people are buying this lens expecting a significant notch up in sharpness over their zoom lens at typical outdoor apertures, they may be underwhelmed or even disappointed. If they are buying it expecting lovely bokeh, colours and rendering, they will be pleased with their new bargain lens!
Comment by Pentaxophile posted on NOT HAPPY with my DA 35mm F2.4AL at 17/12/2011 - 11:36
With the improved sensor on the K5, one could argue that all lenses work better on it!
John
Comment by Pentaxophile posted on DA 18-55 WR "better" on K-5 than K-7? at 17/12/2011 - 11:02
The MZ-S is one of Pentax's serious 'professional' cameras so I would expect it to be pretty tank-like and durable. It's still very pricey 2nd hand, so I would probably look at some of the cheaper options which offer similar features.
But it is a droolsome camera, so if I was loaded and shot more film than I do, I would definitely grab one!
(It's perhaps not the best for manual lenses though, as it doesn't have a split screen... for manual lenses I'd go for a MF body).
Comment by Pentaxophile posted on MZ S at 16/12/2011 - 19:28
Sad to hear C.H. passed away. Difficult to bring up such a (wilfully, wonderfully) controversial figure on a 'no politics no religion' thread, but anyway - I agreed with the man so strongly on some stuff that I can forgive him the rest!
Christopher Hitchens 1949-2011
'He's in Heaven now.'
Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Another pointless thread at 16/12/2011 - 16:28
No doubt you'll tell me there was something in the way which meant you couldn't have done it like that... but I still think a more balanced composition would improve the shot.
This is a good sort of subject for the 10-20mm, as the whole scene from the ground just below the camera, to the rock in the distance, has a lot of interest.
Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Charlie's garden at 16/12/2011 - 16:00
In the meantime, download a trial from their website.
Comment by Pentaxophile posted on RAW processing at 16/12/2011 - 15:14
Naughty Tony!
Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Another pointless thread at 16/12/2011 - 15:06
Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Food, Food, Glorious Food ! at 16/12/2011 - 15:04
Will she let me play with it on Christmas Day?
Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Another pointless thread at 16/12/2011 - 14:59

