Oggy

Joined: 26th December 2008

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

Oggy
Very good indeed. Edges sharp, propellers blurred. Top effort.

Comment by Oggy posted on Piotro @ Farnborough 24th Sat at 25/07/2010 - 17:36

Oggy
Yup - that's going to put a small dent in their tea swindle.

Comment by Oggy posted on Another pointless thread at 25/07/2010 - 17:30

Oggy
TOZZA27 wrote:
Cheating bar stewards - Ferrari should be ashamed of themselves - blatant contravention of the rules of the sport !!!!!

Never liked that Alonso anyway - stirred up the Spaniards against Lewis a couple of years ago ( who me ??? Yeah Fernando - you !!! )

Angry of Bromborough
Hear, hear.

Off with his points.

Comment by Oggy posted on Another pointless thread at 25/07/2010 - 16:34

Oggy
Good stuff Chris. I particularly like the way you have caught the F18 exhaust bloom - I can only catch that on helicopters. The picture of the Devil rather nicely shows just how vast that flag is.

Comment by Oggy posted on Farnborough 2010 - Sat 24th July (12 images) at 25/07/2010 - 14:27

Oggy
dougf8 wrote:
Oggy wrote:
This brings me back to a basic question about photography - are we trying to accurately record something, or produce something that looks nice.
On this site.

Talking about photography, no and no.

But if you're asking about PUF, then yes and yes.
Now I am really confused.

Pentaxophile wrote:
Even if you are trying to record the scene accurately, tweaking is not necessarily cheating - it's a vital part of the process of recording the scene as you would actually see it.

Sometimes you take a picture of something, and when you get back, the colours and contrast are disappointing compared to how you remembered the scene. Your eye, or rather your brain, will perceive and differentiate colours and tones a lot better than the sensor on a camera.
I agree entirely. Some PP could serve to increase the fidelity of the image and overcome limitations of the camera compared to the eye.

Other PP may be to create a whole new effect.

To take the question one stage further, do you take a photograph to please yourself or to earn the approval of others?

Comment by Oggy posted on Landscape4 at 25/07/2010 - 14:20

Oggy
Is she any good? (Photographically, not wishing to initiate a Monarchist/Anti-Monarchist flame war.)

Comment by Oggy posted on Queen opens Flickr account at 25/07/2010 - 14:10

Oggy
I prefer the original. It reminds me of the clay pits out on Dartmoor. The light was often subdued so the contrast would have been down.

This brings me back to a basic question about photography - are we trying to accurately record something, or produce something that looks nice.

Comment by Oggy posted on Landscape4 at 24/07/2010 - 21:21

Oggy
Ooh Sir Sir - I know this one Sir Army Historic Flight

Comment by Oggy posted on Farnborough - Best of a bad bunch (7) at 24/07/2010 - 21:11

Oggy
bforbes wrote:
They will seem better still after this bottle(s) of Old Peculier
I'll see your Old Peculiar and raise you -

Comment Image


After that my grammar will be wholly coincidental.

Comment by Oggy posted on Another pointless thread at 23/07/2010 - 22:05

Oggy
davex wrote:
Quote:
Out of interest, who is (are) the arbiter(s) of correct English?
Thought everybody knew that one ;
George Lazarette

Davex
No. He has abdicated after he was found starting a sentence with a conjunction.

TOZZA27 wrote:
I prefer Asda anyway !!

Tony
Shame on you. What about Waitrose?

Comment by Oggy posted on Publication of magazine to cease, and new website at 23/07/2010 - 21:27

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo