Comments made by noddywithoutbigears - Page 7

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

bwichmawr wrote:
A well observed series. Super place, isn't it?

Andrew

Even though I only live a short distance away from Calke and visit it regularly it still remains one of my favourite National Trust Houses. It never fails to grab my attention with it's faded grandeur, tentatively holding on to it's past glory days.

Comment by noddywithoutbigears posted on Calke Abbey Interior at 15/05/2010 - 20:11

Taken with my trusted Panagor 90mm f2.8 I think at 400 iso. Not your typical interior shots I know, but I like different.

[IMG]http://i50.photobucket.com/albums/f343/Noddy750/Calkeinterior009.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i50.photobucket.com/albums/f343/Noddy750/Calkeinterior019.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i50.photobucket.com/albums/f343/Noddy750/Calkeinterior021.jpg[/IMG]

Comment by noddywithoutbigears posted on Calke Abbey Interior at 15/05/2010 - 18:46

Only really use AV and tend to control the shutter speed with the ISO Fn button.

Comment by noddywithoutbigears posted on Is it cheating to shoot Aperture Priority? at 05/05/2010 - 07:54

Oooops that's shoved up the price of the M 135mm then

It's our secret, don't tell everyone.

Comment by noddywithoutbigears posted on M-135/3.5 - Is it the Most or Least Popular lens here ?! at 05/05/2010 - 07:47

K10D wrote:
If your house sets on fire, don't let the insurer see this picture of a 60W bulb in a 40W watt fitting.

Nice lens. Is it fire proof?

Regards

Using a 60w bulb in this day and age the man should be taken outside and shot.

Love the pics though so you are forgiven, off to search ebay.

Comment by noddywithoutbigears posted on First shot of my 55mm f1.2 Porst! at 24/04/2010 - 08:41

I think the term "Kit Lens" implies that in some way it is an inferior product to be discarded at the earliest opportunity, but these results show that it is a very strong performer for very little money. Maybe we should re-access it's abilities and start using it more.

Comment by noddywithoutbigears posted on 16-45mm vs WR 18-55mm vs Samsun 18-55mm field comparison at 24/04/2010 - 08:36

My hopes were raised, only to be dashed, bugger.

Comment by noddywithoutbigears posted on Picked up six brand new Pentax lenses today, here's a pic at 22/04/2010 - 10:28

That's a fine collection to be proud of, well done that man.

Comment by noddywithoutbigears posted on Fame at last - well nearly !! at 21/04/2010 - 08:17

George Lazarette wrote:
Photoshop has become the enemy of good photography.

G

I'd have to agree, someone with a particular flair for photoshop can mask the little flair they have for photography. I tend you use photoshop less and less and use the inbuilt editor in Vista, if the image is crap it gets binned, I don't spend hours trying to manipulate it into something it's not.

Comment by noddywithoutbigears posted on Fed up!! at 21/04/2010 - 07:54

Unfortunately the general opinion is they are average at best, I believe they were a manufacturer in their own right so there may be some good examples out there but I doubt it, until one of the members proves me wrong of course. In terms of price point I wouldn't go much beyond £30-40 and even then I'd be wary. There are better lenses out there with stronger reputations but if that's your budget take a punt, you never know.

Comment by noddywithoutbigears posted on Opinions, Please at 20/04/2010 - 11:20

Proudly supporting Pentax User

noddywithoutbigears

All Forum Comments

All Forum Comments

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

Proudly supporting Pentax User