All Forum Comments
Comment by MX veteran posted on How do you choose between macros? at 04/03/2008 - 22:25
That is fantastic, but where is Gandalf, shouldn't he be looking out of the window. I love it.
Comment by MX veteran posted on Weekly competition 35: sky's the limit. at 05/03/2008 - 00:49
Comment by MX veteran posted on Weekly Competition #35 - "Sky's the limit..." at 04/03/2008 - 14:15
Comment by MX veteran posted on Llama at 02/03/2008 - 22:24
Comment by MX veteran posted on Weekly Competitions - Closing Time - A Suggestion at 03/03/2008 - 00:07
Comment by MX veteran posted on Should I wait? (DA*50-135mm vs DA* 60-250mm) at 03/03/2008 - 01:03
Olympus haven't entireley abandoned their OM series as an adapter can be bought from Olympus allowing you to use your old lenses. Adapters to convert Pentax to 4:3 are also available, so Olympus have been quite canny by opening up the system to people with older lenses.
Comment by MX veteran posted on need advice - repairs at 03/03/2008 - 16:10
P&S is the biggest part of any manufactures market and should never be ignored.
Most people just want to buy a "good" camera that will record the moment simply with no real effort, and expect it to do so for a good long time into the future.
When you make a DSLR you are potentially only selling a body, not everybody is going to buy your lenses, 'cos not everybody is wealthy enough to, so they look to 2nd party manufactures to get the best value for money.
If Pentax turn their backs on these people then there will be no future for them in the "more up market" DSLR area 'cos there will be no sales to support R&D.
Japanese companies with "cache" have a reputation for abandoning their customers at will as I have experienced: Seiko, Sony, Pentax, Kawasaki, Honda.
The only Jap company that I have found with a commitment above the expected is Nissan.
Having said all this I have more respect for Japanese companies than any other, but they turn their backs on certain markets too easily.
Comment by MX veteran posted on need advice - repairs at 03/03/2008 - 00:45

Comment by MX veteran posted on Fish-Eye Stream at 02/03/2008 - 22:19
Comment by MX veteran posted on Split Screen at 02/03/2008 - 16:56



Taken at F2.8 to see how shallow the depth of field is (very shallow as you can see)
I chose this focal length because:
a) I don't have to be over close at 1:1
b) Excellent reviews about it's sharpness and nice smooth out of focus parts
c) Cost, I got mine for £219
The Sigma 105mm was also considered (at the same cost).