All Forum Comments
Comment by MrCynical posted on Taking photos on London Underground? at 24/10/2010 - 23:05
The only problem is that they eat about 1/3th to 1/4th of the light at the moment
Comment by MrCynical posted on predications Pentax 2010 at 24/10/2010 - 22:55
Flash would be a solution but it's not a simple thing to use effectively because if you use it just on the camera the flash would make your images look flat.
1. Buy a Stofen Omnibounce diffuser
2. Tilt the flash head to bounce the light off the ceiling
I can also vouch for the usefulness of the Metz 48.
Comment by MrCynical posted on 17-50 f2.8 & flash to replace 50mm f1.7? at 24/10/2010 - 18:38
Comment by MrCynical posted on DAL 35mm Review at 24/10/2010 - 18:36
As it stands Pentax's entire standard lens lineup is structured to avoid stepping on the FA31's toes: that's why the hugely popular FA35 was withdrawn, and it's also why the new 35mm is relatively slow compared to the Canikon equivalents.
So I don't think Pentax would introduce a weather-sealed, silent-focusing f1.4 30mm unless they were ready to put the FA Limiteds out to pasture.
As to what I think they will do, I think the most likely is a telezoom "premium kit" counterpart to the new DA 18-135. Maybe a 100-300mm f4-5.6 DC WR?
Comment by MrCynical posted on predications Pentax 2010 at 24/10/2010 - 03:55
If a lens labeled f/2.4 were actually f/2.1 all the shots would be overexposed by about 1/3rd stop.
Comment by MrCynical posted on DAL 35mm Review at 24/10/2010 - 03:02
The Hanimex is not as good. - A bit of a disappointment, really. I had expected it to be better than the Photax, being newer and multi-coated.
Wide open, it is very soft. A bit better when stopped down.
Comment by MrCynical posted on The ten quid lens thread. at 24/10/2010 - 02:58
Might help if you said which lens it is... we don't all follow every one else's gear acquisitions closely!
It's a 35 Limited - IIRC all the shots were wide open except the one of the strap which was f11.
Comment by MrCynical posted on Some sample shots from my newest acquisition at 22/10/2010 - 23:08
is that a common thing? otherwise the AF is fast and silent, i like it!
Comment by MrCynical posted on sigma HSM on Kx, manual focus only?? at 22/10/2010 - 21:20
[IMG]http://i204.photobucket.com/albums/bb159/Carzor_Stelatis/Photography/da35tryout-1.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i204.photobucket.com/albums/bb159/Carzor_Stelatis/Photography/shot1_crop_100pc.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i204.photobucket.com/albums/bb159/Carzor_Stelatis/Photography/da35tryout-2.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i204.photobucket.com/albums/bb159/Carzor_Stelatis/Photography/shot2_crop_100pc.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i204.photobucket.com/albums/bb159/Carzor_Stelatis/Photography/da35tryout-3.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i204.photobucket.com/albums/bb159/Carzor_Stelatis/Photography/da35tryout-4.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i204.photobucket.com/albums/bb159/Carzor_Stelatis/Photography/shot4_crop_100pc.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i204.photobucket.com/albums/bb159/Carzor_Stelatis/Photography/da35tryout-5.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i204.photobucket.com/albums/bb159/Carzor_Stelatis/Photography/shot5_crop_100pc.jpg[/IMG]
PS: The focus issues on #2 aren't the fault of the lens, it was windy. Those on #3 are strictly PBVAS
Comment by MrCynical posted on Some sample shots from my newest acquisition at 22/10/2010 - 21:13


The iconic tube map is copyright, I'd imagine the logo is copyright. beyond that how can you licence the image of a tunnel?? Aren't you the legal beagle?
However, AFAIK this doesn't make photographing either illegal, unless the purpose is to interfere with the trademark in some way. For example, despite McDonalds' famous 'arches' logo being trademarked (and McDonalds being very litigious), nobody has been sued for taking a photograph of a McDonalds despite such photographs including the trademarked logo. So taking a photograph of a London Underground station possibly doesn't infringe the trademark, but selling that photo on a tshirt would.
Of course I'm not a lawyer, and know very little about trademarks (and less than nothing about how English contract law treats conditions of entry to premises) so the above has about the same chance of being right as I have of being the next Archbishop of Canterbury