Mongoose

Joined: 16th November 2006

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

Mongoose
Smeggypants wrote:
[quote:3496ace15f="cabstar"]
Yup two screens for anything serious regarding computing. I use two screens for everything. Even having two windows of Firefox on each screen makes internet usage so much easier.

I don't agree about 'off the shelf' being better for reliability and compatibility though. I have built my own PCs since the mid 1990s and I have NEVER had any of those issues.

In fact in variably it's off the shelf PCs that are preloaded with all kinds of bloat that have caused people problems in my experience.

I agree with all of this 100%. Off the shelf machines have corners cut to build to a price. Self builds will often have this too, but you know which corners you cut and you can make the trade offs necessary to get a reliable machine.

I'm not saying there's no skill involved, but if you know what you're doing and do your homework properly a home build will always trump an OTS for the same price. If you can't build a machine for the price of the OTS, there's a reason for that.

Comment by Mongoose posted on what photo monitor do you use? at 30/07/2013 - 11:03

Mongoose
it is undeniably the case that future generations will find it harder to look though Grandpa's JPGs than we currently do to explorer Grandpa's slides.

Don't forget though, poorly stored and neglected slides have their own problems with fungus etc.

My day job is long term digital preservation software, and I can assure you, what we see as amateur photographers is just the tip of one hell of an iceberg! The longer I work in this field, the less happy I am with my digital photo storage, and the more I lean towards my wifes approach of "pick the ones you'd cry if you lost, have them printed and put them in an album"

Archival grade paper in a decent album is still your best shot at having them easily viewable in 10+ years time.

Comment by Mongoose posted on What To Do With All These Pixels? at 29/07/2013 - 17:17

Mongoose
beautifully executed mockup shots, we all know the myriad reasons why it will never happen but nothing to stop us dreaming eh?

Personally I'd go for a K2 rather than a Spotmatic, but hey, it's your fantasy!

How long would it take to pick your jaw up off the floor if the K-3 was unveiled and it was a K-2 digital update? (yes, I know it's impossible, so is faster than light travel, it doesn't stop me dreaming!)

Comment by Mongoose posted on Best looking Dslr on the planet ? at 29/07/2013 - 09:58

Mongoose
the people of Dubrovnik like in body image stabilisation?

Comment by Mongoose posted on no PENTAX here --- at 26/07/2013 - 11:39

Mongoose
In my case it deppends on the computer and how lazy I'm feeling.

if my eeePc then I use the built in card reader.

If my Laptop I use the built in reader, unless I'm also using an external hard drive because for some reason my old lappy wont do ESATA and SD at the same time.

If a machine which doesn't have a built in reader, I use the camera with a USB cable...... well actually if I'm honest I spend 10 minutes cursing and swearing that I used to have a nice fast SDHC card reader and where the **** is it, then I find a cable and use the camera.

I do find readers are generally faster than the camera, and if downloading several cards it's less hassle to not have to keep swapping cards in the camera just because the card reader doesn't have a door on it. Plus (and this isn't a major consideration given the quality of the kit but still..) it seems sensible to minimise wear and tear on the expensive camera in favour of a cheap card reader.

Comment by Mongoose posted on K5 writing to card at 25/07/2013 - 17:20

Mongoose
Smeggypants wrote:
Mongoose wrote:
this discussion is in danger of decending into an argument, and no one in history has ever won an argument on the internet.

We have all put forth our points, I respectfully suggest that anyone who wishes to now has the necessary information to make up their own minds and we should end it before someone says something they'll regret.
Thank you for not taking it into an argument and saying something you'll regret.

May the discussion continue for all those interested or the mods close the thread.
see, all friends really

Comment by Mongoose posted on K5 writing to card at 25/07/2013 - 16:59

Mongoose
Mike-P wrote:
It's only a statistic though isn't it?

I'm pretty sure Pentax won't fix a shutter problem on say, a 4 year old camera, under warranty if it has done below 100,000 actuations.
As far as I know you are correct, there's no specific warrenty. If it seized at 10,000 you might have a claim under fitness of goods for a given purpose, but I'm no expert on such things.

It's a statistical indicator like the mean time between failures on a hard drive, it guarantees nothing.

Comment by Mongoose posted on What's your highest ever daily 'photo tally'? at 25/07/2013 - 16:45

Mongoose
this discussion is in danger of decending into an argument, and no one in history has ever won an argument on the internet.

We have all put forth our points, I respectfully suggest that anyone who wishes to now has the necessary information to make up their own minds and we should end it before someone says something they'll regret.

Comment by Mongoose posted on K5 writing to card at 25/07/2013 - 16:32

Mongoose
1stEverPentax wrote:
On a slight tangent, does anyone know what the shutter life is on the various ranges of DSLR? Can't see it being a problem for us on the KX /KR level of model but for you
heavies on the K5s it must be a factor in when you decide to change your particular machine? Is the life of the K30 shutter somewhere in between?

Karlo
as far as I'm aware, all the Pentax DSLRs are rated to 100,000 actuations. How that compares to other marques, I'm not sure.

Comment by Mongoose posted on What's your highest ever daily 'photo tally'? at 25/07/2013 - 15:54

Mongoose
Smeggypants wrote:


That is misleading information. You're claiming, or at least implying, that the only way to shoot great pictures and avoiding technical babble is to format the card in the camera. This is NOT true.
I said nothing of the kind, I said that if you format the card in the camera you intend to use it in then (barring technical failure which is very rare with high quality cards and cameras) you will not experience any problems, and can therefore free your mind of card related considerations and get on with taking photographs.

Deppending on exact card/camera combinations, my route may or may not be the only route to trouble free shooting BUT and this is my critical point, no one has ever run into trouble by formatting their cards every time.

Personally, I'd rather stick to a technique which is known to work on all camera/card combinations rather than having a niggling concern in the back of my mind about unexpected and unnececary card problems.

You are of course free to do as you wish with your own equipment and I have no doubt that we will both continue to have no trouble with our own chosen workflows.

Comment by Mongoose posted on K5 writing to card at 25/07/2013 - 15:35

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo