McGregNi

Joined: 31st March 2012

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

McGregNi
Gwyn wrote:
...PU uses non standard software of their own making btw.
One of the strengths here is the very clear layout and readable display of text, which neatly divides posts with the different grey shadings, and the quotes are well set off with white backgrounds. You can clearly see the avatars near the text, and there's good and common sense navigational links also.

I've tried a few other forums and they all suffer from similar ergonomic issues, which this one thankfully doesn't, that can make navigating around annoying and more effort than it should be. So you've chosen well marat, I hope you can take on board some of these good points for your own online developments. And if you're involved in any other forums you could even make suggestions there that they could adopt.

Comment by McGregNi posted on Members on line at 04/07/2014 - 21:26

McGregNi
Very effective framing and subtle colours. It doesn't look critically sharp to me ... Perhaps some additional sharpening on the in-focus areas alone is all that's needed?

Comment by McGregNi posted on first image ever shared at 04/07/2014 - 20:00

McGregNi
Its a good relaxing pose with nice skin tones and sympathetic exposure. I'm not so convinced about the greenery though, which I find clashes somewhat with the subject.

Comment by McGregNi posted on Another from the camera club at 04/07/2014 - 19:56

McGregNi
I know, some things just aren't worth further effort.

Comment by McGregNi posted on Members on line at 04/07/2014 - 19:13

McGregNi
Marat wrote:
McGregNi wrote:
Marat, you've obviously missed the current thread about metering techniques and pentax specific custom settings ... There's a lot of interest there both for seasoned Pentaxians and the odd new starter as well
I have sorry, I am still trying to find my way around, as when I click on the page I must admit I just look at the current topic displayed. With titles like pointless thread and, do you zoom????

I will dig a bit deeper and I am sorry as it wasn't meant to come out like that as I typed it, if you know what I mean?
I agree, navigating around forums can be frustrating ... This one's very good though, it's even been hailed as an example by members on another Pentax forum who want to make changes there! So rest assured you're in the right place.

Comment by McGregNi posted on Members on line at 04/07/2014 - 18:31

McGregNi
Marat, you've obviously missed the current thread about metering techniques and pentax specific custom settings ... There's a lot of interest there both for seasoned Pentaxians and the odd new starter as well

Comment by McGregNi posted on Members on line at 04/07/2014 - 17:53

McGregNi
MattMatic wrote:


(One test is to compare Evaluative, Centre-Weighted, and Spot with centre focus selected on both custom settings.) Matt
Careful, don't want to go off-topic there, isn't that another marques's terminology? I think us Pentaxians have 'Multi-Segment' mode. The K7 is 77 segment actually, so hopefully it'll respond OK to something even fairly small.

But frankly, it may be a minor point, less significant really than where you point the lens at when taking a reading, and the best advice seems to be to go for a lit mid tone on the ground. Personally since coming to Pentax I've stopped using the AE-L button (locking an exposure then holding it while recomposing - too much faffing.) Now I set manual mode and press the green button to take the reading - in M mode its held automatically anyway.

I think there's a setting in the menus also to prevent the exposure from changing when you activate autofocus - thats quite important if you've taken a reading already in M - you don't want that changing when you re-focus (would that happen in M?) ... anyway, there's a custom item to control this.

Its so great that we are talking in detail about Pentax metering and exposure management techniques! Its all excellent, makes me glad I'm still around here

Comment by McGregNi posted on Exposure Compensation at 04/07/2014 - 17:20

McGregNi
Definitely a good idea to experiment ... maybe something backlit, something in shadow with brighter zones behind, and try out the modes as Matt said, then try the custom AF setting on and off.

Comment by McGregNi posted on Exposure Compensation at 04/07/2014 - 15:46

McGregNi
Great birdy action Carl, best for me are 4 & 6

Comment by McGregNi posted on Not a Puffin in Sight! at 04/07/2014 - 14:52

McGregNi
If you're using autofocus, then on a Pentax DSLR check your custom menu item 'link AE to AF point' ... when active this will increase the matrix metered bias to the area covered by the active focus points, and in the case of an in-focus aircraft in the sky, then is likely to increase overall exposure somewhat.

My main concern if shooting this sort of thing would be underexposed aircraft against a correctly exposed sky, which would be the most common automatic scenario (assuming a lot of sky and a much smaller amount of aircraft). It depends of course on the sun direction - if your plane is in shadow it will be worse, and if its got sunlight glinting off it all may be well. The setting I mentioned above may make some difference, but is unlikely to sort everything out.

If metering off ground items then I'd suggest making sure they are actually fully sunlit to get a good balance for the sky - shadow areas will likely cause overexposure if those settings are locked in and then you head for the sky.

Depending on your camera, some underexposure may be preferable for this - you get a little more shutter speed and you can raise the subject selectively a bit in processing - this depends on your cameras shadow raising ability of course.

Comment by McGregNi posted on Exposure Compensation at 04/07/2014 - 14:26

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo