MattMatic

Joined: 2nd July 2002

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

MattMatic
I would suggest trying another web-browser on Windows Phone 8.1

e.g. Chrome, etc

(If the browser uses the "WebKit" core to handle HTML you will probably have a solution.)

Matt

Comment by MattMatic posted on Flu Card Firmware Update at 08/10/2014 - 12:35

MattMatic
Quote:
even when calibrated with my X-Rite i1 Display Pro
I have had trouble calibrating some monitors with the supplied software with some devices.

The ArgyllCMS and dispcalGUI (both OpenSource) are excellent at allowing multi-monitor calibration.

http://www.argyllcms.com/ and
http://dispcalgui.hoech.net/

Might be worth a shot
Matt

Comment by MattMatic posted on Monitors & Calibration Advice at 08/10/2014 - 09:34

MattMatic
Quote:
I have found the 16-50 to be soft pretty much everywhere at F2.8
Mine was like that until I had it serviced
This shot, although at f/5.6, is demonstrative of the lens' capabilities.

Matt

Comment by MattMatic posted on 16-45 to 16-50 at 07/10/2014 - 09:44

MattMatic
The DA16-45 is an excellent all-rounder. Personally I don't the bokeh that much, but otherwise is a very good lens.

The DA*16-50 is a different beast altogether. It's substantially heavier, has a lovely bokeh, and a very nice rendering. It does suffer from quite a bit of purple fringing - it's never a problem when shooting RAW with LR as it can all be handled post-process. (A bit of a problem when shooting JPG).

I am torn between the DA*16-50 and the DA17-70. I found the extra 20mm was very useful indeed. The DA17-70, I think, had the edge on sharpness (at f/4 it really was close to the FA50/1.4!!), is not as heavy, and has excellent bokeh, sharpness and contrast. There is a tiny something special about the DA*'s rendering compared to the DA17-70 - but it's a close call. (My DA*16-50 benefitted from a service at JPS - came back much improved). It was also very convenient having the same filter size on the DA17-70 and DA*50-135

The DA*50-135 is really astonishingly good, and there isn't a direct match at the lower end. The DA*16-50 is weather sealed, but the barrel extends when zooming (I like the relative compactness of the DA*50-135). As mentioned, SDM failures are a common issue.

Money wise, it's a tricky one. DA16-45 go for around £150, DA17-70 for around £300, and DA*16-50 above £500. The improvements are not proportional to the extra spend, alas

For an all-rounder, or a take-one-lens-out, the DA17-70 is superb.

But then for my regular kit, I have the (also astonishing) DA12-24 as well

So many lovely lenses
Matt

Comment by MattMatic posted on 16-45 to 16-50 at 07/10/2014 - 08:49

MattMatic
I have a K10, boxed for sale
Matt

Comment by MattMatic posted on k10 at 05/10/2014 - 05:53

MattMatic
Just a couple of 1cm macro shots - both taken with a cheap 7-dayshop LED light rig.

Super creepy crawlies

#1
Comment Image


#2
Comment Image


Hardly ever use the K5iis at the moment...

Matt

Comment by MattMatic posted on Spiders with the MX-1 at 29/09/2014 - 14:24

MattMatic
SRS has it at £119 too

Comment by MattMatic posted on pentax 35 mm 2.4 at 25/09/2014 - 15:48

MattMatic
Quote:
Matt, you have a touch with noise that seems to elude most of us, so your image is like a spike in the graph and doesn't count!
LOL! An anomaly then

Would love to know what I could do with a 645Z
Matt

Comment by MattMatic posted on Full Frame So They Say at 25/09/2014 - 14:22

MattMatic
That is something! Love that image with the slightly OOF lead in, almost symmetrical view, and delicious light.

Wow!
Matt

Comment by MattMatic posted on Taken the plunge. at 24/09/2014 - 15:40

MattMatic
Quote:
do you concur with Ken though on the issue of the P-TTL pre-flash causing problems
Yes, there are a few that blink faster than a preflash. Always good to do a couple of shots with B&G before - so they know how it feels to be photographed, and to find out if they blink quickly

But it depends on contrast too - fill in flash hasn't been a problem for me.

One event I did I had to use the Metz 50MZ5 for indoor shots, and switch to the AF540 for outdoor fill in. Probably could've done it with just the AF540 in "A" and "P-TTL/HS" modes though

Matt

Comment by MattMatic posted on Flash for wedding photography at 24/09/2014 - 12:35

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo