All Forum Comments
Comment by MattMatic posted on K10 focus check at 03/09/2009 - 09:51
Bit of a shame that the original TTL was removed - it always worked wonderfully on the *ist-D with the Metz 50MZ5.
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on K10D+ 16-50 - underexposure with Slave Flash at 03/09/2009 - 09:37
Now i run huey and it is selected
You should use a Huey to calibrate the screen but this has nothing to do with the printing. By default SPDS will choose the Windows profile for the screen that the Huey chose.
EDIT: You may find this link helpful. Although it covers Capture 1 the principles are still the same
Need a bit more info as to what you are actually doing...
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on silkypix printing query at 03/09/2009 - 09:19
You shouldn't be able to overwrite the RAW (PEF/DNG) file you started with.
I'm confused... but obviously you're not!
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on help please with silkypix at 02/09/2009 - 16:36
With Silkypix you can just drag and drop a folder, or an individual file onto the Silkypix running application.
Personally, as I store all my images in the form: D:IMAGESyeardate-desc I find it easy to just drag the whole directory from explorer onto Silkypix
I then have Silkypix setup to save the JPG/TIFF output files to a "Silkypix" subdirectory.
Edit: When you want to create a JPG or TIFF file just use the "Development" menu. You can press Ctrl-S to save the current file as JPG/TIFF. Failing that you could try the manual
Hope that helps!
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on help please with silkypix at 02/09/2009 - 15:37
I agree about the high ISO - at ISO3200 I've found the K20D excellent... IF the exposure if correct
Often the very dark conditions that necessitate high ISO mean that the exposure meter is operating out of bounds - so it's a good idea to make use of the histogram and take a couple of shots to get it right.
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on K20 high-ISO magenta tinge removal tool at 01/09/2009 - 15:21
When I get a chance I'll try the software on some high ISO shots I have and see how Silkypix handles after running through
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on K20 high-ISO magenta tinge removal tool at 01/09/2009 - 13:25
My personal choice of RAW converter is Silkypix Developer Studio Pro.
Capture One is still excellent - not as full featured as Silkypix, but still excellent results.
Adobe bridge - nah. I don't rate it that highly personally, but others find they can get good results.
For a well priced and legal photographic solution I would say start with the Pentax supplied software (it's based on Silkypix), consider using Silkypix Developer Studio 3 or Pro, and get Photoshop Elements along with www.hiddenelements.com
That will cover most photographic requirements and allow you to follow a majority of tutorials on the web (and if you ever afford the full Adobe Photoshop then you don't have to relearn a great deal)
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on capture one at 01/09/2009 - 13:23
In the meantime, I'd clearly better get some calibration software.
http://www.argyllcms.com/ & http://dispcalgui.hoech.net/
Huey: http://www.pantone.com/pages/products/product.aspx?pid=79
(You don't need the "Pro" if you are going to use ArgyllCMS. The Pro versions of Huey and Spyder are to do with licensing of the software and features. But Argyll is better by far... and free!)
By the way, are notebook screens less prone to error? I've only worked on these up to now, and never had any problems - or at least never noticed any
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on LCD Monitor at 28/08/2009 - 07:21
The DS has a single thumb wheel. However, the custom menu allows a lot of control. It has the same 6Mp sensor as the *ist-D.
Although the *ist-D has two wheels, it uses CF cards. So, you'll probably find the *ist-DS more useful
I still have my original *ist-D, and my wife won't let go of her *ist-DS Quite a difference to the K20D/10D
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on Wanted Pentax cheap digital body at 26/08/2009 - 16:57


The 50/1.4 can be a pain to adjust anyway. It's field isn't flat, and I've found a combination of test target at f/1.4 plus some portrait tests to get the right balance. I've normally found the test target adjustment produces a measure of FF, so somewhere in between is usually good - slightly BF seemed to produce sharper portraits for me. Just a thought
Matt