All Forum Comments
Comment by Mannesty posted on Paid up member? at 16/12/2012 - 06:56
... the 645 is the ultimate camera?
The same may well be true if/when a Pentax FF body is available.
Comment by Mannesty posted on Here's a question for those moist over a Pentax FF at 15/12/2012 - 21:01
The ideal cataloging program would allow you to designate both specific folders (which it can 'watch', (or not)) as well as individual files that might be 'imported' from any directory. If this program is also an editor (like Lightroom) then it should be able to 'save out' to any alternative directory and folder as well. All of this should be able to be controlled entirely manually. Of course, Lightroom would surely provide all of this, I am confident of that.
Comment by Mannesty posted on Lightroom 4 AND Photoshop? at 15/12/2012 - 20:54
I imagine the ropes joining the weights to the pulleys may have been replaced a few times over the years though.
Comment by Mannesty posted on too nervous to take new camera out at 15/12/2012 - 20:45
With respect on a shared computer (that is 8 people) i dont want others having access to
all my photo's, and setting up 8 accounts is not really what we want to do, so importing isn't for me/us...
Comment by Mannesty posted on Lightroom 4 AND Photoshop? at 15/12/2012 - 15:42
As you have to import your images into lightroom, lightroom does dictate where you have your images, in photoshop you open say on a memory stick and save back to the memory stick.
Not so in lightroom.
Don't forget that we are talking here about images from a camera and the workflow of developing said images.
I don't have a clue why you would want to save back to a memory card, but you can if you wish in Lightroom. I shoot RAW, I want my images on my PC, when I have them there I back them up, then I put the card back in the camera and format it. After that, I edit my images, and backup catalogue.
In Lightroom, when you import your images from a memory card, you can tell it where you want them imported (saved) to. You can even make a second copy to a different location for backup purposes.
Alternatively, you can copy the contents of your memory card to anywhere you please, then import the images from there without moving them.
Always remember that the original image file, irrespective of its type, does not get changed in any way whatsoever, so it doesn't matter where it resides. Its the catalogue that knows where the file is and what adjustments have been made to it. Again, the original file remains unchanged.
There seems to be a lot of misinformation and misunderstanding about Lightroom, presumably from people who don't actually know how it works and are unwilling to try it.
Comment by Mannesty posted on Lightroom 4 AND Photoshop? at 15/12/2012 - 15:32
I've said it before and I'll say it again.
I'd like to see a square format using the long side of the APS-C as the size. This way it would save having to turn the camera for landscape and portrait and you could crop to whatever size and shape you wanted. Quite a few of the medium format cameras, both film and digital are square format so why not a DSLR?
CHEERS Vic.
-
Comment by Mannesty posted on Here's a question for those moist over a Pentax FF at 15/12/2012 - 10:30
Another thing I should have mentioned is that I have boarderline learning difficulties and suffer from depression, my photography helps take my mind off that.
Comment by Mannesty posted on too nervous to take new camera out at 15/12/2012 - 10:28
And next we will need a tv at 96inch, to look at all ur F/F images ...
The image quality is exceptional, even close up, and a snip at a mere €64,999.00 (No, not a typo, almost sixty five grand).
Comment by Mannesty posted on Here's a question for those moist over a Pentax FF at 15/12/2012 - 10:24
The kit I have now caters for all of my current photographic needs. A K5-II might be better for my low light race track meetings, but I get by with what I have now so it's unlikely that I'll upgrade yet.
I'm not sure that FF will afford me any benefits over my APS-C gear because I seldom print anything. I've shot events for my son with my gear and he has sold quite a few prints, but none much larger than 9" x 6". Modern camera phones can do that very respectably now.
Basically, what I want from Pentax has been said a thousand and more times by many. Faster and more accurate AF is top of my want list, hopefully the low light issue is now resolved by the K5-II. I don't really care about the size of the sensor.
Comment by Mannesty posted on Here's a question for those moist over a Pentax FF at 15/12/2012 - 09:20

