Mannesty

Joined: 17th February 2005

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

Mannesty
I generaly rely on the "If it ain't broke, don't fix it" principal.

If you are happy with both your on-screen and printed colours you are only ever likely to make things worse by changing a working environment.

Others here may have a more informed opinion.

Personally, I have never connected any of my cameras to the PC, I don't think I could even find the cables to do so very rapidly.

Comment by Mannesty posted on Camera Profile? at 05/04/2007 - 11:04

Mannesty
Hi and welcome.

Your choice of camera and lens package is excellent. Your old lenses will work fine but you all but 10mm at the long end covered by the new lenses.

In 35mm terms, your new lenses will have the equivalent angle of view (AOV) of 27 - 82.5 and 75 - 300mm respectively.

Comment by Mannesty posted on Just Starting Out Again After 15 Years at 04/04/2007 - 14:53

Mannesty
An update (Version 3.7.7) for C1LE to include support for the K10D PEF's was promised for March 2007 . . . it didn't happen . . . yet.

Comment by Mannesty posted on Capture One LE licence with SD cards at 03/04/2007 - 14:00

Mannesty
Why bother bracketting?

Just shoot raw and do the 'bracketting' during post-processing. You have a +/- 3 stop latitude in just one shot.

PS: Pete, you are only about an hour from where I live. Enjoy Almeria.

Regards,

Comment by Mannesty posted on I need ND Filter Help Please at 03/04/2007 - 13:45

Mannesty
Re-read Chris's Method above, where he states that "All metering was done with the viewfinder covered."

Comment by Mannesty posted on Question for Matt on M/K lens metering at 09/04/2007 - 09:25

Mannesty
Quote:

There's another mark next to the central one, one stop further round. I assume that's what it's for. So presumably F8 is really F11 at the long end, etc.
That could be it. That second mark might also indicate the offset for IR focus. I'll have a look at mine tomorrow, I'll try and find a lens manual too.

EDIT: OK, I found a manual and that second mark is the aperture index for longer lengths so at the 200mm end you should position the f8 indication with this mark, not the centre one.

Comment by Mannesty posted on Question for Matt on M/K lens metering at 08/04/2007 - 23:05

Mannesty
Chris,

Good work. A question, did you ensure that ISO (the third variable) remained constant for all tests?

Regarding the 28-200 lens results:- I may be wrong but I think you have to make a minor adjustment to the aperture ring for any particular aperture when moving between extremes of zoom. Reason is that this lens is not constant aperture. I think there are a couple of marks on the aperture barrel somewhere.

Regards,

Comment by Mannesty posted on Question for Matt on M/K lens metering at 08/04/2007 - 22:44

Mannesty
It's possible to force the appearance of VPN.

A RAW shot taken with some shadows is needed. In your preferred editing software, increase the exposure until the banding effect appears.

As Ben said, if the exposure is right to start with, there is little or no problem.

Comment by Mannesty posted on VPN...What Gives? at 09/06/2007 - 11:51

Mannesty
Serif produce a piece of software that I have used to good effect, as well as the Photoshop solution. It's called PanaramaPlus. You can download it and try it for 30 days I think.

Comment by Mannesty posted on Panoramic on the *ist D at 31/03/2007 - 13:08

Mannesty
I like them both, especially the lighting of the cross. Well done.

Comment by Mannesty posted on Mono shots from Cornwall at 29/03/2007 - 18:00

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo