All Forum Comments
Comment by Mannesty posted on DA*16-50 vs DA17-70 at 16/08/2008 - 15:29
Well, I suspect that your chance of getting a bad 16-50 is actually rather low, and if it is bad, your supplier will change it.
G
The 2nd one is on it's way back to SRS for another replacement. I hope I get a good one this time as I have lost a little faith in this lens.
Unlocker had a similar issue I think. That said, don't let it put you off buying one, they're not all bad, and if you buy from a reputable retail supplier you'll have no trouble replacing it if it is faulty.
The images are first class from all of the DA* lens range. They are heavier though, which is why I have a 'proper' kit, and a 'lightweight' kit.
Comment by Mannesty posted on DA*16-50 vs DA17-70 at 16/08/2008 - 11:09
Comment by Mannesty posted on Fixing a busted lens at 15/08/2008 - 17:30
You see, my SMC Pentax Bigger-than-the-Bigma 135-600mm 1:6.7 zoom + 1.7 AF converter makes the max focal length 1020mm. The K10D's SR system only goes up to 800mm
Even on a tripod, with 2 sec delay + mirror lockup, I can't keep the darned thing still enough anyway. If a moth flies within 20 metres, the camera and lens shakes for a week. But that's down to my tripod/head combination . . . which I'm working on.
Comment by Mannesty posted on Thought I would have a go at a Moon shot. at 15/08/2008 - 17:24
I think it should be as simple as that . . . but it might not be.
The lens I fixed was a SMCP-A 50mm 1:1.7 and might be a bit different to yours.
Comment by Mannesty posted on Fixing a busted lens at 14/08/2008 - 21:14
Try blending/HDR'ing them and see what the difference is. It would lose the blurry clouds at least.
Comment by Mannesty posted on HDR - St Ives, Porthmeor Beach at 14/08/2008 - 07:53
The 18-55 MkII is supposed to have a higher resolution to match what is achievable with a K20D.
IMHO: Both the DA 16-45mm and DA*16-50mm lenses are far superior to both of the 18-55 lenses.
Comment by Mannesty posted on Test kit v 1.7 smc 50 mm at 13/08/2008 - 22:26
Comment by Mannesty posted on Copyright Issue at 13/08/2008 - 22:22
Very funny article, thanks for the link.
Edit reason: Spelling correction.
Comment by Mannesty posted on Excuse the swearing ... at 13/08/2008 - 22:17
I've lost count of the number of times that I, and others, have advised you to get your camera sorted. You've got a dud there, but it can be fixed or replaced. You've simply chosen not to go that (logical) route and instead, sell off some very good lenses.
We (the forum) do not understand why you will not get your DS fixed.
Comment by Mannesty posted on Oops Pantax FA43mm Black Not Mint £165 free UK postage at 13/08/2008 - 16:41


I don't think that is an issue with the lens. The K10D's AF sensors need very strong contrast which is why it isn't very good in low light or flatter scenes.