PLUS

Lubbyman

Joined: 28th March 2008

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

Lubbyman
Oh yes! The word is indeed 'delicateness'. A really lovely set. The buttercup and the last one slightly stand out for me, but that's not to diminish the others.

Steve

Comment by Lubbyman posted on portrait lens and tubes at 30/06/2019 - 20:53

Lubbyman
Well seen, well lit. Both work for me. The first says mysterious and slightly uncomfortable, second cousin to the multi-headed Hydra of Greek myth. The second says energy and excitement, a firework display in a flower. Take your pick!

Steve

Comment by Lubbyman posted on Clematis Close Up at 30/06/2019 - 20:41

Lubbyman
What a transformation! Are you sure you didn't add a pinch of magic, too?

And the bridge is now so clear that it justifies the title.

Steve

Comment by Lubbyman posted on Italian bridge revisited at 30/06/2019 - 20:26

Lubbyman
derek897 wrote:

Just for you Steve on a dandelion
That's very good indeed . Can't have been easy! I bet you didn't do it at 1.55am though...

Steve

Comment by Lubbyman posted on Jasmine and Pollen Beetle at 30/06/2019 - 08:12

Lubbyman
There's definitely a 'look' to the backgrounds that's soft and dreamy. Would be reasonable to say (although a big generalisation) use a macro lens to illustrate a textbook about flowers, use a portrait lens + tubes to illustrate a book of poetry?

pschlute wrote:
Oh come on. We all know that extension tubes + portrait lenses are for portraits of very small folk. Stop kidding us
The very small folk are very good at hiding behind foliage when they see a camera. Which is perhaps fortunate if they happen to be a Nac Mac Feegle. (Look it up...)

Steve

Comment by Lubbyman posted on Portrait Lenses with extension tubes at 29/06/2019 - 16:43

Lubbyman
Thanks folks. The experiment with tubes seems to be working.

davidwozhere wrote:
yellow is an absolute sod to get right
Very true. If the subject is yellow, I always reduce the camera's exposure by 0.5 - 1EV then adjust until the result is what I want. It seems to help. This was -0.7EV. Being in shadow also helped, no bright highlights to deal with.

derek897 - Today's macro challenge is the eyes of a pollen beetle. Way beyond me, but for someone of your macro capabilities ...

Steve

Comment by Lubbyman posted on Jasmine and Pollen Beetle at 29/06/2019 - 16:27

Lubbyman
Hardgravity wrote:
now where next?
Into the garden to mow the lawn and remove the weeds that had the temerity to grow during your absence? Up a step-ladder to do the painting you didn't get round to before retirement? Accompany Mrs HG on a trip to numerous shops where she can't decide on the new curtains and furniture? Retirement has many facets...

Steve

Comment by Lubbyman posted on Another pointless thread at 29/06/2019 - 16:17

Lubbyman
johnriley wrote:
I don't think we need the water at all, but the building and its setting are very compelling. How about a letterbox format showing just the building and its surrounding foliage?
Almost agree. The bright patch in the water is a huge distraction. Crop just above it and suddenly the building becomes the focus of attention even with a bit of dark water present. It's still hard to see that there's a bridge below it, but that can be dealt with by a change of title.

Steve

Comment by Lubbyman posted on Italian bridge revisited at 29/06/2019 - 10:58

Lubbyman
Following a suggestion from Lennybloke, I've been experimenting with tubes on an FA77 as part of a project to photograph every type of flower in the garden. The aim of the project is to get 'interesting' pictures rather than just record shots. Here's one of the results.

The flower is Himalayan jasmine at about 1:1 magnification. There was a pollen beetle running around in every flower. This one posed for the shot so I thought it deserved its 15 minutes of fame. In fact, it seems to have replaced the flower as the star of the show.

Any comments or thoughts on the result of the tubes + FA77 experiment? Or messages to pass on to the beetle?

Comment Image


Steve

Comment by Lubbyman posted on Jasmine and Pollen Beetle at 27/06/2019 - 23:37

Lubbyman
Thanks BIll. All credit to mother nature for the gracefulness and light. Low sun and ripening barley is a great combination, much more interesting than wheat (or oil-seed rape...). Can't do any more this year though, it was reduced to stubble a few days ago .

derek897 wrote:
I guessed that Steve, that's why I mentioned it 😂😂😂
And thanks for doing so. I actually liked what I heard. Perhaps pop music hasn't been downhill all the way since the Beatles broke up!

Steve

Comment by Lubbyman posted on Dancers? at 25/06/2019 - 21:29

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo