All Forum Comments
Comment by Lubbyman posted on Cherry Blossom and Berberis at 03/04/2021 - 11:58
Keep 'em coming!
Steve
Comment by Lubbyman posted on Fun with the SMC 85mm SOFT f2.8 lens at 03/04/2021 - 11:49
especially when the body alone costs 1,900000 of them.
Now a serious question: With an O-ME53 magnifier attached to the K3 and wearing my usual glasses, I can just about see the full image through the viewfinder. What would be the advantage (if any) of the new, bigger viewfinder in the K3III?
Steve
Comment by Lubbyman posted on Pentax K-3 Mark III now available to pre-order! at 02/04/2021 - 14:20
So Pentax people prefer soft and dreamy to hard and spiky. I wonder what users of other brands prefer?
Steve
Comment by Lubbyman posted on Cherry Blossom and Berberis at 01/04/2021 - 21:41
As far as delivery times go, Amazon has been getting things to me a day before their original quoted date, and that's with standard free delivery. Don't know whether it's to make us feel happy when it arrives before expected, or they add a day just in case, or their logistics is just a lot better than when they originally decided what the standard free delivery time should be.
Steve
Comment by Lubbyman posted on Another pointless thread at 01/04/2021 - 16:13
Why do you need an extra large backpack or HGV? Surely it comes with its own transportation operative, as shown in the picture. Or is Pentax penny piching by only making that available as a costly accessory?
Steve
Comment by Lubbyman posted on Longest Pentax Lens at 01/04/2021 - 15:59
Thoughts, comments etc. welcome as usual.
1.

2.

Steve
Comment by Lubbyman posted on Cherry Blossom and Berberis at 31/03/2021 - 21:00
The softness is rather special, I can see why you're rather fond of it.
Steve
Comment by Lubbyman posted on Fun with the SMC 85mm SOFT f2.8 lens at 31/03/2021 - 20:43
So please, folks, buy early so Ricoh recovers their R&D costs for the K3III as quickly as possible, then the price can drop for the rest of us!
Steve
Comment by Lubbyman posted on Pentax K3 iii Next Week at 30/03/2021 - 12:34
I only feel happy with them if they are shot at eye level and have a nice diffused (non-sky) background.
For me, the background should reflect the type of bird. So sky as background for this kestrel is OK for me because I think of kestrels as birds of the sky. Similarly for swifts and skylarks. Woodland birds, water birds etc. benefit from other backgrounds. That's just the way I think of things, though, others may think differently. And, of course, there are always exceptions.
Steve
Comment by Lubbyman posted on Kestrel, at 27/03/2021 - 16:19


My initial impression was it wanted a bit more exposure and/or saturation, but actually I think resisting that temptation adds to the overall 'soft' feel
The colour of the blossom on the tree is interesting. Seen from close up, the petals are almost white with the strong colour concentrated in the centre. But from a distance, the blossom is uniformly pink. The brain seems to average out the colours and decide that the answer is 'pink'.
Steve