loskeran

Joined: 8th January 2009

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

loskeran
jackitec wrote:
Loskeran just bought this book and I'm not impressed, the original manual is all you need,
Hi Jack, I depends on what level you are at, and is explanatory on those words and and abbreviations that are used., for someone new to DSLRs it is an easy read
To some just starting with an SLR it is a very big learning curve, so a book that starts with stuff that many of us have for second nature now is not a bad thing, how many go into stores like Jessops get a very expensive Canon/Nikon stuffed in there hands and after a very short time give up because they cant take shots like the professionals do, after all the idiot in the shop told them it was a pro camera, and they expect it to take the shots for them, Just press the button and it does it all for you, after all they were told it was the best bit of kit!
So in a "nutshell" if new to DSLR's learn before you make a big mistake and then say "This camera is no good".
I am not a good reader but I have just sent a load of my old books to a charity shop, They taught me loads, but I am still trying to get it right

Comment by loskeran posted on k20d at 12/06/2009 - 08:28

loskeran
Try this book from the Forum "shop" Magic Lantern Guides £15 for the K20.
It is written in good English and easy to understand.

Comment by loskeran posted on k20d at 11/06/2009 - 21:42

loskeran
Yes it is an ok lens the 50-200mm, I have one that will be going on Ebay shortly, I have the 55-300mm so not required now.

Comment by loskeran posted on Pentax 50-200 DA; Any good? at 11/06/2009 - 19:53

loskeran
Don't bother not worth it,
Many others will also be watching that one, i take it it's the APO version, the one you are watching?
It just depends what you are prepared to pay for it, as for quality, the Pentax *SDM 300mm is a far better bet, but if you want a fairly light lens of that length it is fine, just make sure it is in good condition as it is not a “spring chicken” in age.

Comment by loskeran posted on SIGMA 400mm F5.6 TELEPHOTO PENTAX "A" at 11/06/2009 - 18:33

loskeran
greynolds999 wrote:
loskeran wrote:
shim wrote:
Buying a 1.7x converter to photograph one's Moat and the
tops of one's trees is a perfectly legitimate expense

shim
Or even one's floating duck island.
But not if you don't own a camera!
MP's claim for them as well, one claimed for 3 in a year
must have been a Canon user

Comment by loskeran posted on WANTED: Pentax AF adapter 1,7x at 11/06/2009 - 15:11

loskeran
Who make what cars these days is anybody's guess, Ford use some Peugeot engines (diesel) Renault and Nissan do the same with engines and other bits and the list goes on, so if a car suits you
forget the badge on the front of any thing, if the price is right (value for money etc) get it.
We have become too ready to oblige the advertising people, splash things in front of us enough and it will sell, kids today wont wear anything that does not have the the right label.
Also look at the TV adverts they must be spending a very large amount on womens "beauty" items, (because your worth it)for one.

Comment by loskeran posted on Mag articles like this really annoy me at 11/06/2009 - 13:17

loskeran
Is that the type that attract ants and then stab them in the head and suck the ant body dry.

Comment by loskeran posted on Assasin bug at 11/06/2009 - 10:05

loskeran
shim wrote:
Buying a 1.7x converter to photograph one's Moat and the
tops of one's trees is a perfectly legitimate expense

shim
Or even one's floating duck island.

Comment by loskeran posted on WANTED: Pentax AF adapter 1,7x at 11/06/2009 - 10:01

loskeran
Mike-P wrote:
womble wrote:


So posting the evidence on the web for all to see is not a good idea...?
What evidence, there is only a forum name and guesswork.
Anyway, everyone knows it goes on.
Even our MP's are doing it, and not just the odd couple of £'s they are doing thousands of £'s

Comment by loskeran posted on WANTED: Pentax AF adapter 1,7x at 11/06/2009 - 07:42

loskeran
Another reason for getting Sandisk is the recovery disc, an old friend Bernie accidentally deleted a card with loads of his images on, he formatted it I put it down to the old grey cells
Not only did we recover the shots he took but most of the ones before that.
Mind it should work (the recovery disc) with any make of disc.

Comment by loskeran posted on Why should I buy a Sandisk (or equivalent) Extreme over an Ultra sd card? at 11/06/2009 - 07:22

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo