All Forum Comments
Comment by Leech posted on Underwater Photography at 29/09/2010 - 11:37
I almost upgraded to a kx in may, but decided to wait til photokina.
I have a K10d, from 2007, so the upgrade is really something I look forward too.
It's the iso that does it for me, and that's the primary reason to upgrade. Indoor-low light is always a problem and since I don't think K10 does a good enough job at Iso800, it's going to be a charm
Well video is going to be fun.
Comment by Leech posted on K5, was it worth the wait? at 29/09/2010 - 10:09
I'm in the market to buy a 1.4 teleconverter for my DA* 300mm f.4.
BUT which one is best ? that is which converters work smoothest with the lens, and which gives the best picture ?
I write smoothest because, some converters doesn't allow for AF, and Sigma's doesn't work with the glass elements ???
SO, hope I didn't confuse everyone, but myself..
As I can se, there's
1. Sigma 1.4
2. Tamron 1.4
3. Tenko 1.5
4. Tokina ?
but which should I choose for my 300mm ?
Comment by Leech posted on Teleconverter for DA* 300mm at 08/05/2010 - 15:36
What ISO was used for the respective shots? If the charts for the Kx were taken below the sensor’s base ISO it would be something of an apples to oranges comparison (as I understand it improved high ISO performance typically entails a higher sensor base ISO.)
I'm not sure if they change depending the ISO...
I think I'll be happy with the higher ISO's (trying to shoot lots og birds, and indoor people and stuff. i.e not using it in studio )
As for the iso 100 problem I will only have problem in snowy conditions we a'int got that much sun i Denmark anyway.. lol
Comment by Leech posted on K7, should I wait ? at 04/05/2010 - 09:45
...
As for the K7 vs the KX, the KX sensor produce quite some moiré and demosaicing artefacts while the K-7 is cleaner and it also has more pixels, therefore with the lower ISO where the noise is low these play a part how clean the photo looks and that's why the k-7 is better.
...
uzzlesmiley:
Comment by Leech posted on K7, should I wait ? at 29/04/2010 - 13:08
I know it isn't, but knowing that I can get a better ISO performance in another pentax
I kinda assumed that they all were approx equal at low iso (100-400'ish) ?
Comment by Leech posted on K7, should I wait ? at 29/04/2010 - 12:07
So all in all I thought I could wait till after Photokina, and then some... (the stuff anounced needs to hit the stores )
So having to wait probably a year, we'we decided to buy the k-x and then sell it when they anounce a new.. HURRAY
I generally don't like the idea of buying (read: K-7) something that I already feel is a bit outdated... (I know it isn't, but knowing that I can get a better ISO performance in another pentax).
Comment by Leech posted on K7, should I wait ? at 28/04/2010 - 20:23
When do Pentax "normally" announce new cameras and the like ? Isn't there a time each year, like the car manufactures, where they announce new stuff ? ...
Comment by Leech posted on K7, should I wait ? at 28/04/2010 - 11:53
Comment by Leech posted on K7, should I wait ? at 27/04/2010 - 14:02
Where "another camera" could be the KX, I'm really happy with my weather seal. BUT I hate the iso-performance of my K10, (rarely go beyond ISO 400).
So higher ISO-performance means A LOT to me, but so does weather seal (and the rest).
SO, do you think there, in any distant future will be a upgrade on the ISO performance on the K7 ?
Comment by Leech posted on K7, should I wait ? at 27/04/2010 - 13:17


But alas the price for a underwater housing for my K10 was way off.
So I bought a Cannon powershot S90, and a Ikelite link housing.
I got it all for around 575 GBP.
Just saying, that if you buy a good compact and a underwater housing you can go far. AND I got a second, long missed, pocket camera