All Forum Comments
Comment by Kevin Stephens posted on Why Raw? at 16/07/2005 - 00:40
I think I will be getting P1C1 then save Tiffs for Photoshop 7
Having said that more or less same price as Elements 3 with free Raw plug in
Comment by Kevin Stephens posted on Why Raw? at 14/07/2005 - 17:19
I have been experimenting with Raw and generally disapointed at unweildlyness of Pentax photlab, (not helped by my slowish 1Gz PC).
Is there any benefit with Raw over jpeg if you get the white balance and sensitivity right when you take the shot?
DO they both translate to similar quality Tiff files (via photoshop)?
I have heard some of the issues re sharpness; does applying USM to the Ds' jpegs give as good a result when starting with Raw?
Is the photshop Raw plug in better then Photlab, and is it available (free?) for photoshop 7.0?
Thanlks for any help
Kevin
Comment by Kevin Stephens posted on Why Raw? at 13/07/2005 - 23:18
Comment by Kevin Stephens posted on case for DS and 16-45? at 06/07/2005 - 22:04
Thanks
Kevin
Comment by Kevin Stephens posted on case for DS and 16-45? at 04/07/2005 - 10:50
I predict Pentax will have a new semi pro model out later with 8mp (or larger) sensor,wiht a return of many of the D lost features. Stands to reason with the new range of digital only lenses coming to market (eg 12-24). I doubt if your CF cards will be much use 'though.
Comment by Kevin Stephens posted on No more *ist-D?? at 24/06/2005 - 16:29
Comment by Kevin Stephens posted on No more *ist-D?? at 24/06/2005 - 15:00
I am seriously considering this, I will retian my MX and Ricoh GR1v 35mm cameras and my film scanner.
Please can you help me with some questions.
I am very concerend over dust in sensor problems, does the DS have a shutter to protect the sensor whn changing lenses et, or does the mirror down provide suitable sealing?
One reason for choosing the MZs in the first place was its percieved toughness. How tough is the DS for harsh hot/cold environments?
I like geting occasional enlargements bigger than A3 off scanned (at 5400dpi) negs and transparancies. I have read a lot of discussions on this on the web, but what are peoples opinion of printing large enlargments off a DSLR, ie at 150dpi, interpolated up to say 254dpi before sending to Peak Imaging or similar pro labs?
I would need a new A3 printer,any sensibly priced recommendations?
I would need to get a new wide zoom to overcome the 1.6 crop factor; the 16-45 is a lot more expensive than the 18-55, how do these rank in performance with my 24-90?
Thanks
Kevin
Comment by Kevin Stephens posted on Digital pros and Cons at 06/06/2005 - 17:15
Comment by Kevin Stephens posted on 35mm film processing at 04/06/2005 - 00:06
I will make up my mind today, but probably ask then to persevere with the MZs
Kevin
Comment by Kevin Stephens posted on MZ s woes at 06/06/2005 - 09:25


Just found my PC is not up to either option, more expense