All Forum Comments
Comment by Kevin Stephens posted on k10d delayed? at 16/09/2006 - 18:00
Not sure if this shows power of the web or coincidence
Comment by Kevin Stephens posted on Pentax UK at 19/09/2006 - 11:11
What a Disaster!!
K100 D listed, but no mention of K110D, let alone the K10D!
Lenses: not even a mention of the new 10-17, which is readily available on the market
OK, it's a bit early to mention the 645D, and they have the film body listed
BUT - Not a single 645 lens listed or even referred to! - hardly the way to whet the appetite of anybody who may have heard of the forthcomming wonder camera. This is strange considering that the site does list 6x7 lenses.
Other country's Pentax websites have a news section. For Pentax UK you actually have to fill in a registration form, after which they may condescent to e-mail you the odd titbit.
All this hardly engenders confidence in after sales support and back up
Pentax UK should sort themselves out, put up and maintain a proper website and act like they really want to sell Pentax gear in the UK. ALternatively Pentax should sack them and appoint a more capable distributor.
Comment by Kevin Stephens posted on Pentax UK at 16/09/2006 - 11:09
Park Camera don't want £900
They say that is the SRP, and indicate that they will beat this by a significant margin
I would guess Park and most retailers will initially price it at £800, with further discounts after the initial launch feeding frenzy
Comment by Kevin Stephens posted on K10D is Official on Pentax Canada at 23/09/2006 - 17:36
Thanks
Kevin
Comment by Kevin Stephens posted on 14mm f2.8 ? at 08/09/2006 - 17:04
this may seem far fetched to Nikon and Canon devotees, but consider this
Sony have bought out Konica Minolta and Samsung have bought out Pentax. The resources of these electronic giants is vast compared to Canon or Nikon, and you can be sure they havn't moved into photography for fun; they will be intent on carving out a major market share by competitive pricing and technical innovation.
It has already started; they have both introduced anti-shake into their bodies, so avoiding the massive expense you Canon and Nikon fans incur when buying IS or VR lenses.
Sony manufactures its own sensors and Samsung has the resources to do so too. In future they will be able to get the latest sensors in their cameras first before filtering them down to other manufacturers
Comment by Kevin Stephens posted on Dumb Nikon User at 03/09/2006 - 21:45
When you say you can't match the quality of the original slide; do you mean on your monitor or printer? Maybe one or both are the problem, if so colour matching profiles can help.
A useful test is sent a scanned slide to peak imaging or similar to see what their print is like
I scan Velvia, Elitechrome and Sensia
For critical pics I sometimes used the facility to autofocus on a selected part of the slide
Post scanning tweeking of the histogram is also imprtant to get most detail from a slide to a digital print
Comment by Kevin Stephens posted on Slide scanning issues at 17/05/2006 - 22:24
Comment by Kevin Stephens posted on cleaning sensor and focussing screen on DS at 19/05/2006 - 23:48
what is the safest way to clean the sensor (1 or 2 spots) and screen (quite a few specs)?
Thanks
Kevin
Comment by Kevin Stephens posted on cleaning sensor and focussing screen on DS at 13/05/2006 - 17:52
Pentax and Samsung?
Personally i am not bothered if Pentx becomes Samsung, so long as I can keep up to date with the next generaion DSLR that will fit my existing lenses
Comment by Kevin Stephens posted on Samsung GX-15 announced at 19/01/2006 - 13:16

