No problems here at all!
I posted the link to a genuine website for Software that I use on a day to day basis that has been updated for new users of K5's Like myself, that would like to edit RAW.
I get no malware problems here and the release is new! I thought it odd that they do not mention the K5 which was my main reason for posting and yet the latest release opens K5 Raw and edits them perfectly
No malice or conspiracy here!
Can I assume you do not like DXO?
Or you have a History with them?
Seriously I'd like to know as I do not want to use destructive Software myself but have always found the guys at DXO very imformative and helpful, I bought the Software, I hope it's not another Faux Pas (See what I did there? French see, DXO French See!)On my part and I've bought something Nasty in some way...

See's K5 files now but doesn't mention it:

http://www.dxo.com/en/photo/news/DxO-Optics-Pro-v6.5.1-now-available

Don't know if it's been posted before but it's on the Website in Black and White now...:arrow:
http://www.cosina.co.jp/seihin/voigt/english/dispo.html
And in Colour...
http://www.cosina.co.jp/seihin/voigt/english/sl2-e.html

Like I say it's Sharp


Pentax K7 DFA 100mm Macro at F2.8 Focus on the Sheeps Eye wide open no Sharpening just web resize...

Erm I need to dust...

I see exactly what I said, I was prepared for what I got and just that really! I got what was expected, not disasapointed and not over the moon, I went for the Lens that would do and it will...
Nothing inferred by the "Build Quality" at all save for the want of something to call the way a lens is screwed together...

My DFA 100mm has now arrived!
I get the quibbles some people have about the build quality, it seems adequate no more than that however and it hunts a bit. Despite the fact that I ws expecting all of this I'm a little underwhelmed
Not going to buy another though I'm keeping it, it's very sharp and I'll learn to live with it
Just got off the Phone to Curry's where I got it from, I couldn't in the end afford an extra £100 to get it from Warehouse Express et al and so took the risk, The Lens was delivered in a Jiffy Bag, rolling around in the box with the hood detached and no Packing inserts in the box, also the Storage pouch was missing!
Thats the risk of going this route as I've already read in other threads here, the upshot is my Lens is ok but it's had quite a trip buy the looks of it. You pays yer money and ya gets what ya get...
Enjoyed giving Currys a good rollicking far too much though

May be heading the Curry's/Comet route in a week or so but I think If I can stump up a little more I may just skip, there's been a few of these stories circulating recently and I guess they may be down to the bottom of the 100mm macro Barrel?
Any more positive experiences out there?

Will do Pentaxophile!
There's my problem, I'm not all that bothered about WR As not all my other Lenses are WR anyway, and if the old DFA gives the same image quality save for a bit of Bokeh, I find it hard to justify in my own mind Stumpimg up twice as much money for a lens that will give in all probability the same results. Despite it's lovely build quality I'm not about to throw it about, So good enough will be good enough methinks. For about £500 I'd want SDM and a limiter as well as quickshift
Is lovely though...

Hi Again:arrow:!
Ok I'm lusting for the 100WR again but honestly I just don't think I can swing it, so apart from the Metal tube it sits in (Build Quality, front element coating and of course the WR), what would I miss from the WR if I got the old DFA?
Anything optically better about it???
I have quickly come to realise how valuable quickshift is...

Many Thanks Mike...