johnwhit

Joined: 27th April 2008

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

johnwhit
LMAO

John

Comment by johnwhit posted on Lenses at 29/05/2010 - 22:19

johnwhit
whelmed wrote:
Yeah, it was shot from really low down. So even with correction - the perspective would still be the same in those images then eh?
Thought so, they're all typical of ultra-wide lenses perspective wise. Telephotos appear to foreshorten the distance between objects, whereas wide angles exaggerates the appearance of disance between them, that's what's going on in the first image in particular and to a lesser extent in the second image.

Regards,

John

Comment by johnwhit posted on Returning to the world of Wide Angle at 28/05/2010 - 20:53

johnwhit
Mannesty wrote:
johnwhit wrote:
Mannesty wrote:
SOLD, thanks to all for looking.
OMG what have y'done, you'll regret it
I know I will, but at least I can come here for therapy.

I asked the question in a topic a while ago, do I sell,or keep. I've taken the advice of the masses. Well, 19 to 2 in favour of selling anyway. Of course, it could have been pwynnej logging in using several aliases.
..........bloody barbarians

Comment by johnwhit posted on FS: SMC Pentax-FA 135mm 1:2.8 [IF] lens - boxed at 28/05/2010 - 17:12

johnwhit
That's just perspective in the first 2 images, the 3rd looks far from normal to me! Was it shot from a relatively low position?

regards,

John

Comment by johnwhit posted on Returning to the world of Wide Angle at 28/05/2010 - 17:01

johnwhit
Mannesty wrote:
SOLD, thanks to all for looking.
OMG what have y'done, you'll regret it

Comment by johnwhit posted on FS: SMC Pentax-FA 135mm 1:2.8 [IF] lens - boxed at 28/05/2010 - 16:06

johnwhit
Considering the focal length, it's pretty amazing what Sigma has achieved, but I think I'll stick with the old 10-20 for now.

Regards,

John

Comment by johnwhit posted on Returning to the world of Wide Angle at 28/05/2010 - 16:00

johnwhit
RR wrote:
The Sigma 8-16mm is now out in Canon & Nikon mount so I'd expect some reviews to show up soon. No timescale on the Pentax mount though as far as I'm aware.

I'm guessing that may be too wide for landscapes though & would be better suited to an urban environment when space is at a premium.
Here:

http://www.photozone.de/canon-eos/515-sigma816f4556apsc

John

Comment by johnwhit posted on Returning to the world of Wide Angle at 28/05/2010 - 14:27

johnwhit
To quote from Photozone:

The Pentax DA 12-24mm shows a pretty good distortion characteristic for an ultra-wide zoom lens. At 12mm there's a relatively pronounced degree of slightly wavy barrel distortions (~2.1%) which decrease continuously when zooming towards the long end of the zoom range where the lens is basically free of distortions.

It's very difficult to correct wavy distortion IMHO and 2.1% is quite barrel distorted

The Sigma AF 10-20mm EX DC showed a rather unusual distortion characteristic. At 10mm most of the image field is almost free of distortions so the measured distortions figures look fairly fine here (taken a little inward from the borders). However, this is only part of the truth. If you check the 10mm distortion chart below you will notice that the extreme corners are actually quite (barrel-)distorted - probably in the 2-3% range.

There's virtually no detectable distortion at 12mm, even at 10mm you only need a very slight crop if distortion is visible. I'm not knocking the DA, the resolution, contrast and colour fidelity is truly excellent.

Regards,

John

Comment by johnwhit posted on Returning to the world of Wide Angle at 28/05/2010 - 13:22

johnwhit
Send it to me, I'll look after it for you 'till you decide what you really want to do How's your memory BTW

John

Comment by johnwhit posted on FS: SMC Pentax-FA 135mm 1:2.8 [IF] lens - boxed at 27/05/2010 - 14:37

johnwhit
pschlute wrote:
Stefan

Another vote for the DA* 16-50 from me.

I have always been a prefered prime user, but I bought the 16-50 last year, and now it rarely leaves the camera, it is that good.
It's got my vote too, especially for use in all conditions, the focus direction and Quick shift.

Regards,

John

Comment by johnwhit posted on DA*16-50 vs Sigma 17-50 at 27/05/2010 - 14:17

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo