PLUS

johnriley

Joined: 19th March 2002

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

johnriley
You do seem to be duplicating what you have a fair bit, with 17-70mm and 18-135mm lenses already in the bag. A 31mm will only give to a fast lens and nothing new in your repertoire.

I would yes, be perhaps looking at a fast lens for low light. But how about something longer or a macro lens?

Comment by johnriley posted on DA 15mm F4 or FA 31mm F1.8? at 07/05/2012 - 08:34

johnriley
The k20D is still a very capable camera, so success with your wedding photography is possible with that as well as with a K-5. However, you have made valid points about some aspects of the performance, so who could be surprised that you would want a K-5 having tried it.

The K20D still fetches good prices so maybe ebay will help raise some cash towards it. Don't forget that for shooting weddings you will need backup camera and lenses, just in case something goes wrong with any of the kit. Or indeed in case something gets damaged.

Comment by johnriley posted on K-5 - wow!! at 07/05/2012 - 07:58

johnriley
It's OK JAK, I think the comment was light hearted.

Comment by johnriley posted on Weekly #251 Focus and rejuvenation Discussion at 06/05/2012 - 17:41

johnriley
Although plastic and light, it did produce nice results. However, it wouldn't be my lens of choice either.

Comment by johnriley posted on pentax 28-90mm P FA f3.5-5.6 at 06/05/2012 - 17:18

johnriley
I will reply by PM.

Comment by johnriley posted on K5 vs M4/3 at 06/05/2012 - 00:48

johnriley
Shy? Perhaps not as patient as I am, but in any event there's nothing to be gained by any further comment as you guys seem determined to put a negative spin on anything said.

Comment by johnriley posted on K5 vs M4/3 at 06/05/2012 - 00:40

johnriley
Yep, film can be successfully developed decades after it's theoretically expired.

Comment by johnriley posted on Dark Images with manual lenses. at 05/05/2012 - 23:03

johnriley
Hover over the small medal symbol and your title will be revealed. There was apparently an issue with people who had been members for years but who only had a few posts still being New Members.

I don't have a title at all, despite the number of posts, except of course the names I get called!

Comment by johnriley posted on Member? at 05/05/2012 - 22:31

johnriley
No problem David, I'm not complaining, just explaining.

Comment by johnriley posted on Weekly #251 Focus and rejuvenation Discussion at 05/05/2012 - 22:27

johnriley
Frogfish wrote:
johnriley wrote:
This is something that we discuss and watch, but for now the T&Cs are quite specific. It will come up for discussion again yet.
John, if you are really serious about this statement then surely the virtual (one or two dissenters aside) complete consensus of the membership should be taken into account ?
It's not easy to assess what a complete consensus might be, but it's clear that it's not possible to reconcile opposing viewpoints. The last time this was discussed it was decided that quite a number of members preferred the restriction to Pentax matters and there is not often much pressure to change it. Once people stop arguing, traffic numbers usually go up, because presumably most of us find conflict distracting and unwelcome.

It's discussed at intervals, and although there are always those who think that ulterior motives drive things, in fact there's no agenda other than trying to help Pentax Users. Equally, there is no pressure from anywhere to express any particular views or have any particular stance on any subject. So when I write something, you can be sure I mean it. That will also be true of the rest of the team.

Comment by johnriley posted on K5 vs M4/3 at 05/05/2012 - 20:52

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo