All Forum Comments
Comment by johnriley posted on Another pointless thread at 09/05/2012 - 16:28
Comment by johnriley posted on Another pointless thread at 09/05/2012 - 15:58
Comment by johnriley posted on Jpeg sharpening at 09/05/2012 - 15:57
All digital images can benefit from some sharpening, but too much looks dreadful.
You are correct that minus means softer, plus means sharper. 0 is the default setting. Whether that means no sharpening at all or not I don't know.
Comment by johnriley posted on Jpeg sharpening at 09/05/2012 - 13:58
It is good practice to format a card in the camera you are going to use it in. I do this every time I re-use a card. It keeps the file structure in good order.
Comment by johnriley posted on Images taken by the camera at 09/05/2012 - 12:35
We can all help by not mentioning spammers as then that makes another post that has to be removed, especially when people quote the spam. If you just ignore them they will be dealt with.
Comment by johnriley posted on Another pointless thread at 09/05/2012 - 08:46
When I say odd conditions though, they will have to be pretty extreme. Once it gets too dark for the AF to work properly it's really too dark to manually focus properly as well. One solution is an LED torch. These are very bright and can be used to illuminate a subject to enable focusing on it. There are always ways round things.
If it's too dark to AF then a tripod will presumably be in use anyway.
When shooting disco dancing at a wedding I had no problem with the K-5 locking on to the dancers, apart from now and again. The lighting varied enormously from quite bright to very dark, but the colour could be anything. It worked very well.
Do your tests again in daylight and see where you are at that point?
Comment by johnriley posted on K5 vs M4/3 at 09/05/2012 - 08:41
Comment by johnriley posted on Sigma IQ Expectations... at 08/05/2012 - 21:56
If we wanted a real test of speed it would need to be comparing like with like, so different camera bodies with their respective 35mm lenses, for example.
I have found the 18-135mm and 35mm f2.4 to be very fast when coupled with the K-5. Very much faster than the K20D, for example.
Comment by johnriley posted on K5 vs M4/3 at 08/05/2012 - 21:52
Thanks jhnpennington, it seems you aren't discussing AF speed, but something else entirely - that is, FF/BF. This is an area where we need to be careful about altering the settings, and the manual does advise to only change anything if absolutely necessary.
I would go back to basic principles and reset factory settings. Set the AF system on centre point focvus only and just look through the viewfinder and see where the lens focuses. Take photos to confirm, but most of the time the focus should be so close as to be absolutely fine. If it isn't and it's way out then there's always the possibility that you have a fault.
Always check focus in daylight. Also, it's worth checking that the dioptre setting is correct so that you can see what's happening properly. Point the camera at a blank wall or blank sky, defocus the lens and adjust the dioptre until the etched lines in the viewfinder are clearest.
Now your eye will be focusing on the focusing screen in a relaxed way at it's natural focusing distance.
Hope that helps, but if there's still a problem it might be an idea to check out another K-5 with your lenses.
Comment by johnriley posted on K5 vs M4/3 at 08/05/2012 - 21:48

