PLUS

johnriley

Joined: 19th March 2002

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

johnriley
I think you'll fine new ones aren't pre-worn. You might have to put in some fair wear and tear to ahieve that look.

Comment by johnriley posted on mx1 at 31/01/2013 - 15:51

johnriley
In the past few years, Focus has become less and less orientated to camera makers and more and more towards all the other aspects of photography. Printing, presentation, studio, clothing, etc. I seem to remember other marques disappearing for a year here and there.

We'll have to wait and see if Pentax decide to join in, but it would be a good opportunity to handle new lenses.

Comment by johnriley posted on Focus on imaging 2013 No Pentax at 31/01/2013 - 15:38

johnriley
steven9761, why are you looking at a Panasonic website to see what Pentax mean by Intelligent Zoom?

That seems as mysterious as the function....

Comment by johnriley posted on Intelligent Zoom? at 31/01/2013 - 15:33

johnriley
The launch price is in line with the competition Mark. We're assuming that the MX-1 shares some of its makeup with the Olympus, probably the new ZX-10. However, the brass top and bottom plates will add cost.

In any event, it looks attractive and, like Ken, I like the look of this very much.

Comment by johnriley posted on mx1 at 31/01/2013 - 11:54

johnriley
There's still a degree of confusion though over the term "sharpness" - this refers to our perceptions and can be influenced heavily by contrast in an image. A contrasty image always looks sharper.

What we are talking about it rather an improvement to the resolution of fine detail, an improvement in clarity.

We can already make images look sharp, when viewed from the proper distance for the size, but we can't improve the resolution unless it's there to begin with.

Comment by johnriley posted on JR K5 IIs review at 31/01/2013 - 11:50

johnriley
It's an expansion of the 12-24mm to 28mm, still f/4 and intended for APS-C sensors. It would fit well as a replacement for the 12-24mm, if that's what is intended.

The point is co-operation between manufacturers helping to control costs and to maximise the use of production facilities, I would imagine. And an extension of the range for the photographer.

It will be interesting to see if a Pentax version appears and indeed if it performs as well as the excellent 12-24mm.

Comment by johnriley posted on DA*16-85 still on roadmap at 31/01/2013 - 10:02

johnriley
Quote:
I would suggest that anyone living near the proposed path of the new HS2 should get snapping.
Indeed so, once things get under way the changes will come suddenly and without notice. It's amazing how fast whatever is in the way gets dismantled.

Comment by johnriley posted on Here Today, Gone Tomorrow at 31/01/2013 - 09:24

johnriley
It casn remove minor bugs, which is probably rarely mentioned except as "improves stability", and can add useful features. I updated the Q, without which the adapter for K lenses could not be used.

It is a simple process, just follow the instructions and make sure the battery is fully charged.

Comment by johnriley posted on New Pentax Firmware updates for 6 cameras at 31/01/2013 - 09:22

johnriley
You need to check the Sigma website - their lens designations are quite different to Pentax.

Comment by johnriley posted on "DL" lens? at 30/01/2013 - 21:58

johnriley
That's pretty tragic!

Comment by johnriley posted on Here Today, Gone Tomorrow at 30/01/2013 - 20:51

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo