PLUS

johnriley

Joined: 19th March 2002

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

johnriley
What you have been told is probably correct, but you've misunderstood what was meant.

Physically, both sensors are the same size - approx. 23.5 x 15.7mm - but the K100D contains only 6.1 million pixels (6.1MP) and the K10D has 10.2MP which will enable bigger enlargements, but the individual pixels have to be smaller to fit them all on the chip.

Bigger pixels are more sensitive to light and the K100D has a sensitivity up to 3200 ISO. The K10D stops at 1600 ISO. So in low light the K100D will have greater sensitivity and lower noise.

For your needs the K100D may be more appropriate.

Comment by johnriley posted on Buying Advice! at 15/02/2007 - 17:57

johnriley
The only reasons to buy the K100D in prefernce to the K10D would be the lower price, if you were not contemplating making big prints (larger than A4) and if you decided you needed the 3200 ISO setting (the K10D stops at 1600).

Otherwise, every advantage lies with the K10D, which competes at a level similar to the Nikon D200 in terms of quality and specification, but with a really exciting price level.

Comment by johnriley posted on Buying Advice! at 15/02/2007 - 17:30

johnriley
Quote:
If they are waiting for 13, I'll bet they only get 12.
They'll be pretty upset if that happens and they did have 1000 on order!

Comment by johnriley posted on Jessops keeping me waiting ! at 16/02/2007 - 08:45

johnriley
Well, I would assume that -13 in stock is no stock and 13 orders already in and paid for.

1000 cameras is pretty impressive in one way, but it won't go far round 300 shops!

Hope you get your camera soon - the wait will be worth it.

Comment by johnriley posted on Jessops keeping me waiting ! at 15/02/2007 - 16:06

johnriley
Only meant that the instruction book doesn't actually say the green button will work, but refers us to page 210 which describes quite clearly how and where exposure errors may occur. The answer seems to be Manual setting, and via the optical stop down switch.

Unfortunately I can't test the point as I have now moved over entirely to A series or later lenses.

So red herring in the sense that Pentax don't appear to have ever claimed it would work....

:

PS If I'm right in this, I'm not surprised there is confusion because the wording of the manual is, IMHO, atrociously vague.

Comment by johnriley posted on K10 manual metering question. at 15/02/2007 - 14:58

johnriley
A couple of thoughts.

First, if you use a screw thread lens then whatever aperture you set it to (set the A/M switch on the lens to M) the camera will have to accept that as open aperture and Av should work just fine.

With a K or M bayonet lens you need to use optical stop down (on the collar around the shutter release button) to stop the lens down and activate the meter in M mode.

Don't forget to set the custom function to permit use of aperture ring.

The use of the green button in these cases may prove to be a red herring...

Comment by johnriley posted on K10 manual metering question. at 15/02/2007 - 13:42

johnriley
Sue and myself and friends will be there on Sunday.

Comment by johnriley posted on Focus on Imagaing 2007 Anyone Going ?? at 15/02/2007 - 00:02

johnriley
Focus lock is intended to avoid the lens "creeping" if it is pointed downwards or upwards. So, for example, if you were copying documents you could lock the focus point and know that the lens would not gradually creep out of focus due to gravity.

All this implies that the camera is on a tripod and you are making a series of pictures at the same focus point.

In macro work of the kind i have described, manual focus is also very much easier than autofocus.

Comment by johnriley posted on Pentax 100mm Macro at 13/02/2007 - 15:56

johnriley
A simple and inexpensive 1970s (?) lens that I would expect to give competent but unexciting results.

The Pentax 135mm lenses of the period should be significantly better.

Comment by johnriley posted on hoya 135mmf2.8 at 13/02/2007 - 08:03

johnriley
Quote:
Still, that said, I wouldn't mind a full frame DSLR. However, I reckon that a reasonably priced one is a way off yet. I wouldn't mind higher resolution, say 8 or 12 mega pixel, and 14 or 16-bit depth (rather than 12). An extra 2 bits would give more headroom for me, especially when working in low light and raking detail out of the shadows.
I pulled that quote from Matt from the second of those threads.

You got 10.2MP and 22 bit, so I guess it was worth the two year wait!

Comment by johnriley posted on In the move from film to digital ... at 15/02/2007 - 13:58

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo