All Forum Comments
Comment by johnriley posted on New Sensor? at 21/02/2009 - 09:00
I would suggest you set the highest quality JPEG settings and then try everything on the camera. Shoot lots of images, enjoy the process and share a few with us here.
You've got a great kit that should keep you very busy for a while. Later on you might decide on more lenses for specific purposes (such as a Macro lens) but for now just have fun.
Comment by johnriley posted on Another one with a k-m/k2000 at 20/02/2009 - 01:07
The same applies to SLR mirrors and focusing screens - leave well alone as they are incredibly sensitive parts.
DIY jobs on modern electronic cameras are not for those of a nervous disposition. Don't do it!
Comment by johnriley posted on New Sensor? at 19/02/2009 - 23:15
If you do a search on this forum you will find lots of threads covering the details in great depth.
The lenses are definitely worth using, they will just be a little less convenient than A lenses and later.
Comment by johnriley posted on Using older Pentax lenses at 19/02/2009 - 09:07
Comment by johnriley posted on 35mm DA Ltd at 18/02/2009 - 18:10
Try inexpensive printing solutions such as Vistaprint and Able Labels and I think you'll end up with a much better product at a lower unit cost.
Comment by johnriley posted on producing postcards & greeting cards at 18/02/2009 - 16:17
If you want to see a really good viewfinder have a look through a Voigtlander Bessamatic - it's useless for focusing but the aerial viewfinder image is just staggering!
Comment by johnriley posted on K3D* rumour with 1.3x crop factor at 18/02/2009 - 12:02
Comment by johnriley posted on K3D* rumour with 1.3x crop factor at 18/02/2009 - 08:56
This will work with all DA lenses apart from the 18-250mm. It is not possible with FA lenses, so don't try to force them.
Comment by johnriley posted on Macro Advice from the experts please! at 18/02/2009 - 08:52
Comment by johnriley posted on pentax 100 2.8 smc dfa VS sigma 105 2.8 at 17/02/2009 - 22:18


We know the actual sensor is covered by a filter, but the filter is fragile too. There are specialised products for sensor cleaning, so when necessary use those. When necessary.
So far from the *istDS to the K10D and now the K20D I have not so far found the need to use any sensor cleaner that makes contact.
When i think of all the dust that used to mar negatives and all the spotting big prints needed, I think we might be getting over anxious about our relatively dust free sensors. After all, it's incredibly easy to do a bit of spotting in Photoshop!