PLUS

johnriley

Joined: 19th March 2002

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

johnriley
If we are talking about inkjet prints then A4 would be a more likely size. If printed by a lab you could choose 12x8 inches, which is pretty close to full frame.

There is a choice. If you want the whole frame then you resize accordingly at 300ppi and accept that you will not fill some paper sizes. Just cut off the excess.

If you want to fill the paper use the Crop Tool and enter the size values in the top bar. When you crop, the image will be automatically resized and the image will be the same proportions as the paper.

Comment by johnriley posted on Print sizes .. I need help plz at 24/02/2009 - 21:32

johnriley
You'll have to give the postman a key so the package and a nice cup of tea can be delivered at the same time.

Comment by johnriley posted on SRS - 1st Class service again at 24/02/2009 - 19:56

johnriley
Telephoto lens. Open aperture. Close distance. All this equates to shallow DOF, which is clearly shown in your image.

You focused on the bricks and the bricks are sharp.

Comment by johnriley posted on DOF at 24/02/2009 - 18:20

johnriley
Quote:
should I understand that I would have some trouble with the English policemen if I were in the same situation on an English beach?
I doubt it very much. You might find a confrontation if you were in a city centre, but again it's doubtful in most places. There have been some incidents where the Police have misinterpreted the law and tried to enforce non-existent regulations. Who knows why.

Comment by johnriley posted on Normandy beaches trip at 24/02/2009 - 18:16

johnriley
Just take your camera kit and enjoy yourself. I think the Freanch are quite used to seeing people take photos on the Normandy beaches!

Comment by johnriley posted on Normandy beaches trip at 24/02/2009 - 15:41

johnriley
True, the 16-50mm is weather sealed.

Comment by johnriley posted on 16 - 45 versus 16 - 50 at 24/02/2009 - 14:32

johnriley
Quote:
John, one quick question: I recently met a chap called Paul Jones at work here in Golborne (East Lancs road). He's a member of the Atherton Photographic Society. He mentioned the club had its own great Pentax advocate called John. I'm guessing this is your own good self?
That would be me.

Comment by johnriley posted on EBAY - 50mm K lens / should we all have one?! at 24/02/2009 - 14:31

johnriley
Also the 16-45mm is smaller and lighter than the 16-50mm.

Quality difference will be virtually irrelevant, only the stop difference in speed is really significant.

Comment by johnriley posted on 16 - 45 versus 16 - 50 at 24/02/2009 - 14:28

johnriley
Well, bringing out detail and mist are sort of mutually exclusive, aren't they? Mist obscures and therein I think lies the problem. Can you have both?

Having said that, the composition is good. A nice lead in drops off into mist in the distance, which is also good. I would think more mist for me, but, as I said, it's your image.

Comment by johnriley posted on Foggy Cemetery at 24/02/2009 - 14:24

johnriley
1) Either will do very well, provided the used one is in mint condition.
2) Yes. Use A series or later lenses for most convenience.
3) Exactly the same.
4) At one time all new cameras tended to be supplied with 50mm lenses, so there are lots of them about.
5) The f1.7 will be better if you want to use it close up for document copying and to generally abuse it with add on lenses or extension tubes. The f1.4 will be better for low light work. But the difference generally will be minimal.

Hope that helps!

Comment by johnriley posted on EBAY - 50mm K lens / should we all have one?! at 24/02/2009 - 13:27

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo